Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 29,2025 No.11 Detail

Application of valsartan in combination with amlodipine in adverse reactions in elderly patients with hypertension

Published on Dec. 01, 2025Total Views: 298 times Total Downloads: 48 times Download Mobile

Author: ZHOU Yan SU Fei ZHU Junjun LYU Xiongsheng

Affiliation: Department of Cardiology, Lishui Second People's Hospital, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang Province, China

Keywords: Valsartan Amlodipine Hypertension Elderly FAERS database Adverse drug event Rational drug use Signal mining

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202507050

Reference: ZHOU Yan, SU Fei, ZHU Junjun, LYU Xiongsheng. Application of valsartan in combination with amlodipine in adverse reactions in elderly patients with hypertension[J]. Yaoxue QianYan Zazhi, 2025, 29(11): 1906-1913. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202507050.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To identify potential adverse drug event (ADE) signals associated with the concomitant use of valsartan and amlodipine in elderly patients with hypertension by mining the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, and provide evidence for pharmacovigilance and rational clinical use.

Methods  ADE reports from the FAERS database between Q1 2004 and Q1 2025 involving patients with hypertension aged ≥60 years who received valsartan, amlodipine, or their combination were retrieved. Signal detection was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the proportional reporting ratio (PRR). The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) version 26.1 was applied for classification by system organ class (SOC) and preferred terms (PT). The time-to-onset (TTO) characteristics of ADE were also analyzed.

Results  A total of 40,276 ADE reports were extracted, including 34,852 reports for valsartan or amlodipine monotherapy and 5,424 for combination therapy. Among the combination therepy reports, females accounted for 58.0%, with the majority in the 65-85 age group (n=3,925, 66.5%). Hospitalization was the most common ADE across all three groups. Signal detection identified 301 adverse signals for valsartan, 312 for amlodipine, and 408 for combination therapy, involving categories such as investigations, vascular and lymphatic disorders, nervous system disorders, cardiac disorders, and metabolic and nutritional disorders.

Conclusion  Compared with valsartan or amlodipine monotherapy, concomitant use of valsartan and amlodipine is associated with more prominent ADE signals. Clinicians should pay close attention to potential ADE during combination therapy and adjust drug regimens in a timely manner.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Li L, Duan L, Xu Y, et al. Hypertension in frail older adults: current perspectives[J]. PeerJ, 2024, 12: e17760. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17760.

2.Klotz U. Pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism in the elderly[J]. Drug Metab Rev, 2009, 41(2): 67-76. DOI: 10.1080/03602530902722679.

3.Oliveros E, Patel H, Kyung S, et al. Hypertension in older adults: assessment, management, and challenges[J]. Clin Cardiol, 2020, 43(2): 99-107. DOI: 10.1002/clc.23303.

4.Markham A, Goa KL. Valsartan. a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic use in essential hypertension[J]. Drugs, 1997, 54(2): 299-311. DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199754020-00009.

5.Zhou W, Yang X, Jin J, et al. The efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int Urol Nephrol, 2024, 56(1): 181-190. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03599-w.

6.Huang QF, Li Y, Wang JG. Overview of clinical use and side effect profile of valsartan in Chinese hypertensive patients[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther, 2013, 8: 79-86. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S38617.

7.Wang JG, Palmer BF, Anderson KV, et al. Amlodipine in the current management of hypertension[J]. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), 2023, 25(9): 801-807. DOI: 10.1111/jch.14709.

8.Drugs for hypertension[J]. Med Lett Drugs Ther, 2024, 66(1703): 81-88. DOI: 10.58347/tml.2024.1703a.

9.Sofy AA, Abdelsattar AT, Mohammed OM, et al. Amlodipine compared with benidipine in the management of hypertension: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev, 2020, 27(6): 527-537. DOI: 10.1007/s40292-020-00412-y.

10.Plosker GL, Robinson DM. Amlodipine/valsartan: fixed-dose combination in hypertension[J]. Drugs, 2008, 68(3): 373-381. DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200868030-00008.

11.Carey RM, Moran AE, Whelton PK. Treatment of hypertension: a review[J]. JAMA, 2022, 328(18): 1849-1861. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.19590.

12.Morris R, Ali R, Cheng F. Drug repurposing using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database[J]. Curr Drug Targets, 2024, 25(7): 454-464. DOI: 10.2174/0113894501290296240327081624.

13.Egberts AC, Meyboom RH, van Puijenbroek EP. Use of measures of disproportionality in pharmacovigilance: three Dutch examples[J]. Drug Saf, 2002, 25(6): 453-458. DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200225060-00010.

14.Norén GN, Bate A, Orre R, et al. Extending the methods used to screen the WHO drug safety database towards analysis of complex associations and improved accuracy for rare events[J]. Stat Med, 2006, 25(21): 3740-3757. DOI: 10.1002/sim.2473.

15.Sakaeda T, Tamon A, Kadoyama K, et al. Data mining of the public version of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System[J]. Int J Med Sci, 2013, 10(7): 796-803. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.6048.

16.Sheppard JP, Benetos A, McManus RJ. Antihypertensive deprescribing in older adults: a practical guide[J]. Curr Hypertens Rep, 2022, 24(11): 571-580. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-022-01215-3.

17.Huang L, Zhang Y, Xing L, et al. Pharmacological research progress of novel antihypertensive drugs[J]. Discov Med, 2024, 36(184): 882-897. DOI: 10.24976/Discov.Med.202436184.83.

18.Wira CR 3rd, Kearns T, Fleming-Nouri A, et al. Considering adverse effects of common antihypertensive medications in the ED[J]. Curr Hypertens Rep, 2024, 26(8): 355-368. DOI: 10.1007/s11906-024-01304-5.

19.Zhang Y, Zhao X, Huang H, et al. Network Meta-analysis of sacubitril/valsartan for the treatment of essential hypertension[J]. Clin Res Cardiol, 2023, 112(7): 855-867. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-022-02120-0.

20.Singh J, Elton A, Kwa M. Comparison of various calcium antagonist on vasospastic angina: a systematic review[J]. Open Heart, 2023, 10(1): e002179. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002179.

21.Liberman AL, Razzak J, Lappin RI, et al. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after emergency department visits for hypertensive urgency[J]. Hypertension, 2024, 81(7): 1592-1598. DOI: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.22885.

22.Kumari K, Sinha R, Toppo MS, et al. Blood pressure reducing potential and renoprotective action of cilnidipine among hypertensive patients suffering from chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(4): e37774. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37774.

23.Dou W, Liu X, An P, et al. Real-world safety profile of tetracyclines in children younger than 8 years old: an analysis of FAERS database and review of case report[J]. Expert Opin Drug Saf, 2024, 23(7): 885-892. DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2359615.

24.Li D, Wang H, Qin C, et al. Drug-induced acute pancreatitis: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database[J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2024, 115(3): 535-544. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.3139.

Popular papers
Last 6 months