Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 27,2024 No.2 Detail

The effectiveness of salvage treatment with intratympanic dexamethasone or hyperbaric oxygen therapy in addition to systemic steroids on idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Published on Mar. 21, 2024Total Views: 756 times Total Downloads: 373 times Download Mobile

Author: JIN Kailin 1 ZHAO Qin 2 HUANG Yingliang 1

Affiliation: 1. Department of Otolaryngology, First People's Hospital of Linping District of Hangzhou City, Hangzhou 311100, China 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Xixi Hospital of Hangzhou, Hangzhou 311100, China

Keywords: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss Intratympanic steroids Hyperbaric oxygen therapy

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202312105

Reference: JIN Kailin, ZHAO Qin, HUANG Yingliang.The effectiveness of salvage treatment with intratympanic dexamethasone or hyperbaric oxygen therapy in addition to systemic steroids on idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J].Zhongguo Yaoshi Zazhi,2024, 27(2):302-308.DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202312105.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To investigate the clinical efficacy of intratympanic corticosteroids (ITS) and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) who had failed systemic corticosteroid (SS) treatment.

Methods  ISSNHL patients admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology, First People's Hospital of Linping District of Hangzhou city from January 2020 to January 2023 were retrospectively collected. According to the treatment plan, patients with ISSNHL were divided into SS group, HBOT group, and ITS group. The changes in hearing level [purity hearing threshold mean (PTA)] and hearing gain of ISSNHL patients before treatment (T0), day 5 (T1) and after 3 months of treatment (T2) were observed and compared, and the total effective rate of treatment in different groups was compared. Univariate analysis was used to explore the influencing factors of the efficacy of patients with different treatment modalities of ISSNHL.

Results  A total of 156 ISSNHL patients were included, including 70 in the SS group, 33 in the HBOT group and 53 in the ITS group. At T0, there was no significant difference in PTA among the three groups of patients (P>0.05). At T2, the level of PTA in the three groups of ISSNHL patients was significantly lower than that before treatment (P<0.05). The levels of PTA in the HBOT group and ITS group were significantly lower than those in the SS group (P<0.05). The level of PTA in the HBOT group was significantly lower than that in the ITS group (P<0.05). The hearing gain of the HBOT group and the ITS group was significantly higher than that of the SS group (P<0.05), and the hearing gain of the HBOT group was significantly higher than that of the ITS group (P<0.05). The total effective rate of HBOT group was significantly higher than that of ITS group (P<0.05), and the total effective rate of ITS group was significantly higher than that of SS group (P<0.05). In addition, vertigo was an influencing factor for poor hearing recovery in ISSNHL patients regardless of treatment regimen (P<0.05).

Conclusion  Both ITS and HBOT can improve the treatment efficiency of ISSNHL patients who have failed SS treatment and promote hearing recovery in ISSNHL. Compared with IST, HBOT has more significant efficacy, and it is recommended that clinical treatment be prioritized. Vertigo is an influencing factor for poor hearing recovery in patients with ISSNHL who have failed SS treatment, and should be focused on in clinical practice.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会. 突发性聋诊断和治疗指南(2015)[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015, 50(6): 443-447. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860. 2015.06.002.

2.Mohammadi M, Balajelini MHT, Rajabi A. Migraine and risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol, 2020, 5(6): 1089-1095. DOI: 10.1002/lio2.477.

3.Covelli E, Altabaa K, Verillaud B, et al. Intratympanic steroids as a salvage therapy for severe to profound idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2018, 138(11): 966-971. DOI: 10.1080/ 00016489.2018.1497805.

4.Chandrasekhar SS, Tsai Do BS, Schwartz SR, et al. Clinical practice guideline: sudden hearing loss (Update)[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2019, 161(1_suppl): S1-S45. DOI: 10.1177/0194599819859885.

5.Van Dishoeck HA, Bierman TA. Sudden perceptive deafness and viral infection; report of the first one hundred patients[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1957, 66(4): 963-980. DOI: 10.1177/000348945706600406.

6.Veldman JE. Cochlear and retrocochlear immune-mediated inner ear disorders. Pathogenetic mechanisms and diagnostic tools[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1986, 95(5Pt1): 535-540. DOI: 10.1177/000348948609500518.

7.Wei BP, Stathopoulos D, O'Leary S. Steroids for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013, 2013(7): CD003998. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.

8.Kuo TC, Chao WC, Yang CH, et al. Intratympanic steroid injection versus hyperbaric oxygen therapy in refractory sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a meta-analysis[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2022, 279: 83-90. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06616-9.

9.Tong B, Wang Q, Dai Q, et al. Efficacy of various corticosteroid treatment modalities for the initial treatment of idiopathic sudden hearing loss: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Audiol Neurootol, 2021 26: 45-52. DOI: 10.1159/000508124.

10.Committee on hearing and equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1995, 113(3): 186-187. DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(95)70103-6.

11.Siegel LG. The treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 1975, 8(2): 467-473. DOI: 10.1016/S0030-6665(20) 32783-3.

12.Sano H, Okamoto M, Ohhashi K, et al. Quality of life reported by patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2013, 34(1): 36-40. DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318278540e.

13.Alimoglu Y, Inci E, Edizer DT, et al. Efficacy comparison of oral steroid, intratympanic steroid, hyperbaric oxygen and oral steroid+hyperbaric oxygen treatments in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss cases[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2011, 268: 1735-1741. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1563-5.

14.Hosokawa S, Sugiyama KI, Takahashi G, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as adjuvant treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss after failure of systemic steroids[J]. Audiol Neurootol, 2017, 22: 9-14. DOI: 10.1159/000464096.

15.Keseroglu K, Topta¸s G, Uluat A, et al. Addition of intratympanic steroid or hyperbaric oxygen treatment to systemic steroid treatment in sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss treatment, and long-term results of salvage treatment[J]. Turk J Med Sci, 2020, 50(1): 177-183. DOI: 10.3906/sag-1908-122.

16.Mariani C, Carta F, Catani G, et al. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: effectiveness of salvage treatment with intratympanic dexamethasone or hyperbaric oxygen therapy in addition to systemic steroids[J]. Front Neurol, 2023, 14: 1225206. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1225206.

17.Rhee TM, Hwang D, Lee JS, et al. Addition of hyperbaric oxygen therapy vs medical therapy alone for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2018, 144: 1153-1161. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.2133.

18.Mathieu D, Marroni A, Kot J. Tenth european consensus conference on hyperbaric medicine: recommendations for accepted and non-accepted clinical indications and practice of hyperbaric oxygen treatment[J]. Diving Hyperb Med, 2017, 47: 131-132. DOI: 10.28920/dhm47.1.24-32.

Popular papers
Last 6 months