Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 29,2025 No.11 Detail

Efficacy and safety of celecoxib for preemptive analgesia in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a Meta-analysis

Published on Dec. 01, 2025Total Views: 264 times Total Downloads: 42 times Download Mobile

Author: WANG Xiaojie 1, 2 ZHANG Chunxia 2 BAI Feng 2 DONG Zhiqiang 2 QIN Ruili 3

Affiliation: 1. Department of Pharmacy, Baotou Central Hospital, Baotou 014040, Inner Mongolia, China 2. Department of Pharmaceutical Clinical Research, the First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, Inner Mongolian, China 3. Department of Cardiac Function, the First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, Inner Mongolian, China

Keywords: Celecoxib Preemptive analgesia Preventive analgesia Orthopedic surgery Visual analogue Scale Meta-analysis

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202504062

Reference: WANG Xiaojie, ZHANG Chunxia, BAI Feng, DONG Zhiqiang, QIN Ruili. Efficacy and safety of celecoxib for preemptive analgesia in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: a Meta-analysis[J]. Yaoxue QianYan Zazhi, 2025, 29(11): 1931-1941. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202504062.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of celecoxib for preemptive analgesia in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Methods  PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Wanfang database, CNKI, VIP and SinoMed were systematically searched to collect randomized controlled trials about the use of celecoxib for preemptive analgesia in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. RevMan 5.4 software was used for Meta-analysis.

Results  A total of 11 RCTs were included, with a total of 985 patients. The results of the Meta-analysis showed that in the resting state, the VAS scores of patients in the trial group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 12 h [MD=-0.48, 95%CI (-0.83, -0.14), P=0.006], 24 h [MD=- 0.40, 95%CI (-0.58, -0.21), P<0.000 1], 48 h [MD=-0.31, 95%CI (-0.51, -0.11), P=0.002] and 72 h [MD=-0.21, 95%CI (-0.34,  -0.07), P=0.003] after surgery. In the active state, the VAS scores of patients in the trial group were significantly lower than those in the control group at 6 h [MD=-0.49, 95%CI (-0.86, -0.11), P=0.01], 24 h [MD=-0.46, 95%CI (-0.68,  -0.24), P<0.000 1], 48 h [MD=-0.24, 95%CI (-0.44, -0.05), P=0.02] after surgery. There was no statistically significant differences in the VAS scores between the two groups at 6h after surgery in the resting state and at 72  h after surgery in the active state (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting [RR=0.72, 95%CI (0.57, 0.91), P=0.006] and cardiovascular adverse reactions [RR=0.24, 95%CI (0.06, 0.93), P=0.04] was significantly lower in the trial group than in the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative constipation, dizziness, somnolence, and skin itching between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion  In orthopedic surgery, the use of celecoxib for preemptive analgesia can alleviate early postoperative pain and reduce the incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting, and cardiovascular adverse reactions in patients..

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.陈丽琼, 吴斌, 洪阿梅, 等. 术后急性疼痛的现状调查 [J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2021, 37(11): 1200-1203. [Chen LQ, Wu  B, Hong  AM, et al. Investigation on the current situation of postoperative acute pain[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2021, 37(11): 1200-1203.] DOI: 10.12089/jca.2021.11.017.

2.谢锦伟, 杨静, 黄强, 等. 骨科、麻醉科加速康复围手术期疼痛、睡眠和焦虑障碍管理专家共识[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2025, 18(3): 212-221. [Xie JW, Yang  J, Huang Q, et al. Expert consensus on the management of perioperative pain,sleep,and anxiety disorders in orthopaedics and anesthesiology for enhanced recovery after surgery[J]. Chinese Journal Bone and Joint Surgery, 2025, 18(3): 212-221.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2025.03.03.

3.肖祥华, 王凤, 张姣姣, 等. 多学科协作干预对骨科围手术期睡眠障碍患者疼痛状况、恢复效果的影响[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2023, 20(3): 145-148. [Xiao XH, Wang F, Zhang JJ, et al. The effect of multidisciplinary collaborative intervention on pain status and recovery effect of patients with sleep disorders in orthopedic perioperative period[J]. Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2023, 20(3): 145-148.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2023.03.038.

4.Li JW, Ma YS, Xiao LK. Postoperative pain management in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Orthop Surg, 2019, 11(5): 755-761. DOI: 10.1111/os.12535.

5.Ma N, Yi P, Xiong Z, et al. Efficacy and safety of perioperative use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for preemptive analgesia in lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Perioper Med (Lond), 2023, 12(1): 61. DOI: 10.1186/s13741-023-00347-7. 

6.Xu J, Li H, Zheng C, et al. Efficacy of preemptive use of cyclooxyenase-2 inhibitors for total knee arthroplasty: a mini-review[J]. Arthroplasty, 2019, 1(1): 13. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-019-0015-3.

7.潘帅虎, 张云飞, 任俊涛, 等. 塞来昔布超前多模式镇痛对TKA患者疼痛管理控制、炎症因子及术后早期功能恢复的影响[J]. 中国医药科学, 2023, 13(7): 170-173. [Pan  SH, Zhang  YF, Ren JT, et al. Effects of preemptive multimodal analgesia with celecoxib on pain control, inflammatory factors and early postoperative functional recovery in TKA patients[J]. China Medicine and Pharmacy, 2023, 13(7): 170-173.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0616.2023.07.043.

8.万丽, 赵晴, 陈军, 等. 疼痛评估量表应用的中国专家共识: 2020版[J]. 中华疼痛学杂志, 2020, 16(3): 177-187. [Wan L, Zhao Q, Chen J, et al. Chinese expert consensus on the application of pain assessment scales: 2020[J]. Chinese Journal of Painology, 2020, 16(3): 177-187.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101379-20190915-00075.

9.刘津池, 刘畅, 华成舸. 随机对照试验偏倚风险评价工具RoB2(2019修订版)解读[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2021, 21(6): 737-744. [Liu JC, Liu C, Hua CG. Risk bias assessment tool RoB2 (revised version 2019) for randomized controlled trial :an interpretation[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2021, 21(6): 737-744.] DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.202011144.

10.Karst M, Kegel T, Lukas A, et al. Effect of celecoxib and dexamethasone on postoperative pain after lumbar disc surgery[J]. Neurosurgery, 2003, 53(2): 331-337. DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000073530.81765.6b.

11.Kashefi P, Honarmand A, Safavi M. Effects of preemptive analgesia with celecoxib or acetaminophen on postoperative pain relief following lower extremity orthopedic surgery[J]. Adv Biomed Res, 2012, 1: 66. DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.100197.

12.Kheirabadi D, Safavi MR, Taghvaei M, et al. Comparing the prophylactic effects of oral gabapentin, pregabalin, and celecoxib on postoperative pain management in orthopedic surgery of the lower extremity: a double-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. J Res Med Sci, 2020, 25: 9. DOI: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_140_19.

13.Pu C, Jiang X, Sun Y, et al. Efficacy and safety between early use and late use of celecoxib in hip osteoarthritis patients who receive total hip arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study[J]. Inflammopharmacology, 2021, 29(6): 1761-1768. DOI: 10.1007/s10787-021-00880-1.

14.Liu J, Wang F. Preoperative celecoxib analgesia is more efficient and equally tolerated compared to postoperative celecoxib analgesia in knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, controlled study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(51): e13663. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013663.

15.Huang YM, Wang CM, Wang CT, et al. Perioperative celecoxib administration for pain management after total knee arthroplasty-a randomized, controlled study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2008, 9: 77. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-77.

16.Ittichaikulthol W, Prachanpanich N, Kositchaiwat C, et al. The post-operative analgesic efficacy of celecoxib compared with placebo and parecoxib after total hip or knee arthroplasty[J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2010, 93(8): 937-942. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20718170/.

17.Boonriong T, Tangtrakulwanich B, Glabglay P, et al. Comparing etoricoxib and celecoxib for preemptive analgesia for acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2010, 11: 246. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-246.

18.沈彬, 唐新, 杨静, 等. 围手术期口服塞来昔布对全膝关节置换术后疼痛和功能康复的近期影响和安全性观察 [J]. 中华外科杂志, 2009, 47(2): 116-119. [Shen B, Tang X, Yang  J, et al. Effects of perioperative administration of celecoxib on pain management and recovery of function after total knee replacement[J]. Chinese Journal of Surgery, 2009, 47(2):116-119.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2009.02.013.

19.钟远鸣, 周劲衍, 李智斐, 等. 超前镇痛及规律性按时给药对腰椎间盘突出症术后疼痛及功能影响的临床研究[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2014, 22(4): 369-372. [Zhong YM, Zhou JY, Li ZF, et al. Clinical study on the effects of preemptive analgesia and regular timely administration on postoperative pain and function in patients with lumbar disc herniation[J]. Orthopedic Journal of China, 2014, 22(4): 369-372.] DOI: 10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2014.04.18.

20.代巍, 代颖, 芦英, 等. 塞来昔布在全髋关节置换手术超前镇痛中的应用价值分析[J]. 实用药物与临床, 2020, 23(1): 30-33. [Dai W, Dai Y, Lu Y, et al. Application value of celecoxib in preemptive analgesia of total hip replacement[J]. Practical Pharmacy and Clinical Remedies, 2020, 23(1): 30-33.] DOI: 10.14053/j.cnki.ppcr.202001007.

21.Saito T, Iwamoto S, Murotani K, et al. Efficacy of celecoxib as preemptive analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial[J]. Surg Today, 2021, 51(7): 1118-1125. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02199-w.

22.Geng X, Zhou S, Zhang X, et al. The efficacy and safety of celecoxib for pain management after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9: 791513. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.791513. 

23.尹合勇, 郭艾, 马立峰, 等. 塞来昔布联合氨酚羟考酮多模式超前镇痛对老年股骨颈骨折患者围术期疼痛及术后早期髋关节功能的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志, 2022, 21(10): 1074-1078. [Yin HY, Guo A, Ma LF, et al. Effect of multimodal preemptive analgesia on perioperative pain and early postoperative hip function in patients with femoral neck frac-ture undergoing artificial bipolar femoral head replacement[J]. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 2022, 21(10): 1074-1078.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-4695.2022.10.018.

24.Zhou Y, Liu X, Ding C, et al. Positive preemptive analgesia effectiveness of pregabalin combined with celecoxib in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective controlled randomized study[J]. Pain Res Manag, 2023, 2023: 7088004. DOI: 10.1155/2023/7088004.

25.Wang C, Fu H, Wang J, et al. Preemptive analgesia using selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors alleviates postoperative pain in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: a protocol for PRISMA guided meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(7): e24512. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024512.

26.Memtsoudis SG, Poeran J, Kehlet H. Enhanced recovery after surgery in the United States: from evidence-based practice to uncertain science?[J]. JAMA, 2019, 321(11): 1049-1050. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.1070.

Popular papers
Last 6 months