Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 29,2025 No.11 Detail

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of iron sucrose and iron polysaccharide in hemodialysis patients and construction of an infection risk model based on dynamic iron

Published on Dec. 01, 2025Total Views: 275 times Total Downloads: 39 times Download Mobile

Author: LIU Chengcheng ZHOU Hui JIA Liyue

Affiliation: Hemodialysis Center, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang Province, China

Keywords: Renal dialysis Iron sucrose iron Iron polysaccharide Iron metabolism disorders Infectious complications Risk model Chronic kidney disease Risk factors Nomogram

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202506036

Reference: LIU Chengcheng, ZHOU Hui, JIA Liyue. Comparison of the therapeutic effects of iron sucrose and iron polysaccharide in hemodialysis patients and construction of an infection risk model based on dynamic iron[J]. Yaoxue QianYan Zazhi, 2025, 29(11): 1863-1870. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202506036.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To compare the iron supplementation efficacy and infection safety between iron sucrose and iron polysaccharide in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, and to construct an infection risk model based on dynamic iron parameters.

Methods  A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who received MHD treatment at the Hemodialysis Center of Wenzhou People's Hospital from January 2022 to December 2024. Patients were divided into the iron sucrose group and the iron polysaccharide group according to the iron supplement they received. Hemoglobin (Hb), serum iron, transferrin saturation (TSAT), and ferritin (SF) levels were compared between the two groups, and the occurrence of infection was recorded. Multivariate Logistic regression was used to identify the independent risk factors of infection. An infection risk model was constructed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the predictive ability, calibration ability, and net clinical benefit of the predictive model.

Results  A total of 150 patients were included, with 75 in the iron sucrose group and 75 in the iron polysaccharide group. Compared with the iron polysaccharide group, the iron sucrose group showed a higher increase in Hb and TSAT and a lower infection rate (P<0.05). SF>800 ng/mL, TSAT>45%, C-reactive protein>10 mg/L, recent hospitalization, diabetes mellitus, and higher erythropoietin doses were independent risk factors for infection (P<0.05). The established infection model had an area under the ROC curve of 0.728, demonstrating good predictive ability, calibration ability, and net clinical benefit.

Conclusion  In MHD patients, iron sucrose supplementation significantly improves anemia and iron metabolism, with a lower associated infection rate. The infection model based on dynamic iron parameters can be used to guide risk stratification and individualized iron supplementation.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.张莉娟, 王承百慧, 郝珏, 等. 维持性血液透析患者症状管理研究进展[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2024, 21(6): 196-200. [Zhang LJ, Wang CBH, Hao J, et al. Research progress in symptom management of maintenance hemodialysis patients[J]. Practical Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2024, 21(6): 196-200.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6170.2024.06.044.

2.Bazeley JW, Wish JB. Recent and emerging therapies for iron deficiency in anemia of CKD: a review[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2022, 79(6): 868-876. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.09.017.

3.童宗武. 铁剂在血液透析患者中的合理应用[A]//云南省玉溪市人民医院·昆明医科大学第六附属医院.滇中南肾脏病论坛、云南省肾脏疾病诊疗暨血液净化技术新进展学习班资料汇编[C]. 云南省玉溪市人民医院-昆明医科大学附属六院, 2017: 156-162. DOI: 10.26914/c.cnkihy.2017.002817.

4.Del Vecchio L, Ekart R, Ferro CJ, et al. Intravenous iron therapy and the cardiovascular system: risks and benefits[J]. Clin Kidney J, 2020, 14(4): 1067-1076. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa212.

5.Cases A, Puchades MJ, de Sequera P, et al. Iron replacement therapy in the management of anaemia in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients: perspective of the spanish nephrology society anaemia group[J]. Nefrologia (Engl Ed), 2021, 41(2): 123-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.nefroe.2020.11.011.

6.杨国华, 闫雪. 维持性血液透析患者透析过程中贫血发生现状及相关影响因素分析[J]. 中华养生保健, 2025, 43(5): 178-181. [Yang GH, Yan X. The occurrence and related influencing factors of anemia in maintenance hemodialysis patients during dialysis[J]. Zhonghua Yangsheng Baojian, 2025, 43(5): 178-181.] https://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail?id=PeriodicalPaper_QKC20252025050600012855&dbid=WF_QK.

7.李婉莎. 重组人促红素联合蔗糖铁在维持性血液透析肾性贫血患者中的应用研究[J]. 北方药学, 2025, 22(2): 173-175. [Li WS. The application of recombinant human erythropoietin combined with sucrose iron in maintenance hemodialysis patients with renal anemia[J]. Journal of North Pharmacy, 2025, 22(2): 173-175.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8351.2025.02.058.

8.Agarwal R, Fishbane S, Locatelli F, et al. Oxidative stress and renal injury with intravenous iron in haemodialysis patients[J]. Kidney Int, 2004, 66(6): 2314-2319. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00648.x.

9.Shah AA, Donovan K, Seeley C, et al. Risk of infection associated with administration of intravenous iron: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021, 4(11): e2133935. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.33935.

10.国家卫生健康委办公厅. 血液净化标准操作规程(2021版) [S]. 2021.

11.Del Vecchio L, Ekart R, Ferro CJ, et al. Intravenous iron therapy and the cardiovascular system: risks and benefits[J]. Clin Kidney J, 2020, 14(4): 1067-1076. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa212.

12.Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Anemia Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for anemia in chronic kidney disease[J]. Kidney Int Suppl, 2012, 2(4): 279-335. https://kdigo.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/KDIGO-2012-Anemia-Guideline-English.pdf.

13.刘亚茹. 蔗糖铁联合左卡尼汀注射液对维持性血液透析尿毒症患者肾性贫血血红蛋白达标率及肾功能的影响[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2024, 53(9): 661-665. [Liu YR. Effect of iron sucrose combined with levocannabinoids on Hb attainment and renal function in patients with uremia on maintenance hemodialysis uremia[J]. Shanxi Medical Journal, 2024, 53(9): 661-665.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2024.09.005.

14.Fan X, Cao K, Wong RSM, et al. A whole-body mechanistic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling of intravenous iron[J]. Drug Deliv Transl Res, 2025, 15(4): 1109-1120. DOI: 10.1007/s13346-024-01675-x.

15.Nicholson L, Axon E, Daru J, et al. Effect and safety of intravenous iron compared to oral iron for treatment of iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2024, 12(12): CD016136. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD016136.

16.Pasricha SR, Tye-Din J, Muckenthaler MU, et al. Iron deficiency[J]. Lancet, 2021, 397(10270): 233-248. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32594-0.

17.Lu R, Zhang X, Cai X, et al. Efficacy and safety of polysaccharide iron complex capsules compared with iron sucrose in hemodialysis patients: study protocol for a randomized, open-label, positive control, multicenter trial (IHOPE)[J]. Trials, 2021, 22(1): 691. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05663-1.

18.Lu R, Jin H, Cao J, et al. Randomized, positive-controlled study on the efficacy and safety of oral polysaccharide-iron complex therapy in patients on hemodialysis[J]. Kidney Int Rep, 2025, 10(6): 1742-1749. DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.03.017.

19.Portolés J, Martín L, Broseta JJ, et al. Anemia in chronic kidney disease: from pathophysiology and current treatments, to future agents[J]. Front Med (Lausanne), 2021, 8: 642296. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.642296.

20.Batchelor EK, Kapitsinou P, Pergola PE, et al. Iron deficiency in chronic kidney disease: updates on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2020, 31(3): 456-468. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2019020213.

Popular papers
Last 6 months