Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 26,2023 No.12 Detail

Evaluation of the analgesic efficacy and safety of ketorolac in patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty

Published on Jan. 24, 2024Total Views: 953 times Total Downloads: 372 times Download Mobile

Author: Wu-Jun YUAN 1 Ping-An XU 2 Zhen LIANG 2 Lei WANG 1

Affiliation: 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Xi'an Labor Union Hospital, Xi'an 710100, China 2. Department of Orthopaedics, Xi'an Ordnance Industry 521 Hospital, Xi'an 710065, China

Keywords: Ketorolac Percutaneous vertebroplasty Pain relief Safety

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202311243

Reference: Wu-Jun YUAN, Ping-An XU, Zhen LIANG, Lei WANG.Evaluation of the analgesic efficacy and safety of ketorolac in patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty[J].Zhongguo Yaoshi Zazhi,2023, 26(12):449-455.DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202311243.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the effect and safety of ketorolac on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Methods  The clinical data of patients who underwent percutaneous vertebroplasty in Xi'an Labor Union Hospital from January 2020 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, and the patients were divided into ketorolac group and control group according to whether they were given ketorolac after surgery. The visual analogue pain score (VAS) before, 6 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery, postoperative fentanyl usage (dosage, time of first compression analgesic pump, number of compressions), Oswestry disability index (ODI) before, 3 days, 1 month and 6 months after surgery, bone mineral density and bone metabolism indexes before, 3 month and 6 month after surgery, the incidence of adverse reactions within 72 hours after surgery and satisfaction with pain intervention were compared between the two groups.

Results  A total of 90 patients were included in the study, including 48 patients in the ketorolac group and 42 patients in the control group. At 6 h, 24 h and 48 h after surgery, the VAS score of the ketorolac group was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The amount of fentanyl and the number of compressions in the ketorolac group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the time of the first compression analgesic pump was significantly longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in bone mineral density, serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BALP) and type I collagen C-terminal peptide (CTX-I) levels between the two groups before surgery (P>0.05). At 3 months and 6 months after surgery, the bone mineral density, serum BALP and CTX-I levels of the two groups were significantly improved compared with those before surgery (P<0.05). At 3 days, 1 month and 6 months after surgery (P<0.05), the ODI of patients in both groups was significantly improved compared with that before surgery. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions at 72 hours after surgery between patients in the ketorolac group and the control group (P>0.05). In addition, the satisfaction with pain relief in the ketorolac group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion  Ketorlac can effectively improve the postoperative pain of patients with PVP without affecting the postoperative recovery of patients, with a low incidence of adverse reactions and a high safety profile, which can effectively improve patients' satisfaction with pain relief.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Kurakula M, Rao G. Pharmaceutical assessment of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP): as excipient from conventional to controlled delivery systems with a spotlight on COVID-19 inhibition[J]. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol, 2020, 60: 102046. DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2020.102046.

2.Hao Y, Peng B, Si C, et al. PVP-modified multifunctional Bi2WO6 nanosheets for enhanced CT imaging and cancer radiotherapy[J]. ACS Omega, 2022, 7(22): 18795-18803. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01591.

3.Noguchi T, Yamashita K, Kamei R, et al. Current status and challenges of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP)[J]. Jpn J Radiol, 2023, 41(1): 1-13. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-022-01322-w.

4.Peris P, Blasco J, Carrasco JL, et al. Risk factors for the development of chronic back pain after percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment[J]. Calcif Tissue Int, 2015, 96(2): 89-96. DOI: 10.1007/s00223-014-9940-x.

5.秦晓君, 黄承军, 苏正义, 等. 内热针治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折患者经皮穿刺椎体成形术术后残余疼痛的疗效观察[J]. 中医药导报, 2023, 29(2): 5. [Qin XJ, Huang CJ, Su ZY, et al. Observation on the efficacy of internal heat acupuncture in the treatment of residual pain after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J]. Traditional Chinese Medicine Herald, 2023, 29(2): 5.] DOI: 10.13862/j.cn43-1446/r.2023.02.017.

6.Yang JS, Liu JJ, Chu L, et al. Causes of residual back pain at early stage after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a retrospective analysis of 1,316 cases[J]. Pain Physician, 2019, 22(5): E495-E503. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31561662/.

7.行勇刚, 张贵林, 田伟, 等. 骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折患者术后腰背疼痛原因分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2015, (29): 4. [Xing YG, Zhang GL, Tian W, et al. Analysis of causes of postoperative low back pain in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J]. Chinese Medical Journal, 2015, (29): 4.] DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn. 0376-2491.2015.29.002.

8.Jiang Q, Huang SQ, Jiao J, et al. Effect of the combination of ketorolac and bupivacaine on transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after gynecological laparoscopic surgery[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2020, 26: e925006. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.925006.

9.Hannon CP, Fillingham YA, Spangehl MJ, et al. The efficacy and safety of periarticular injection in total joint arthroplasty: a direct meta-analysis[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2022, 37(10): 1928-1938.e9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2022. 03.045.

10.Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, et al. Measures of adult pain: visual analog scale for pain (VAS pain), numeric rating scale for pain (NRS pain), McGill pain questionnaire (MPQ), short-form McGill pain questionnaire (SF-MPQ), chronic pain grade scale (CPGS), short form-36 bodily pain scale (SF-36 BPS), and measure of intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain (ICOAP)[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2011, 63: S240-252. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20543.

11.Smeets R, Koke A, Lin CW, et al. Measures of function in low back pain/disorders: low back pain rating scale (LBPRS), oswestry disability index (ODI), progressive isoinertial lifting evaluation (PILE), Quebec back pain disability scale (QBPDS), and Roland-Morris disability questionnaire (RDQ)[J]. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken), 2011, 63: S158-173. DOI: 10.1002/acr.20542.

12.Jebb AT, Ng V, Tay L. A review of key likert scale development advances: 1995-2019[J]. Front Psychol, 2021, 12: 637547. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637547.

13.王汉平, 张晓明. 鲑鱼降钙素治疗老年骨质疏松性椎体骨折疼痛的疗效观察[J]. 中国药师, 2008, 11(4): 2. [Wang HP, Zhang XM. Observation on the efficacy of salmon calcitonin in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fracture pain in the elderly[J]. China Pharmacist, 2008, 11(4): 2.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-049X.2008.04.009.

14.刘海全, 吴梅剑宗, 蒙祖玉. 淫羊藿诱导ADSCs成骨分化作用于骨质疏松症防治的研究进展[J]. 医学新知, 2023, 33(5): 381-388. [Liu HQ, Wu MJZ, Meng  ZY. Research progress on epimedium-induced osteogenic differentiation of ADSCs for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2023, 33(5): 381-388.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202303044.

15.Gomaa OM, Jassim AY, Chanda A. Bioremoval of PVP- coated silver nanoparticles using aspergillus niger: the role of exopolysaccharides[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2022, 29(21): 31501-31510. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-18018-9.

16.吴靦, 代文化, 曾伟, 等. 基于加速康复外科理念的去阿片化麻醉镇痛在急诊剖宫产围手术期运用观察 [J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2023, 32(2): 166-172. [Wu X, Dai WH, Zeng W, et al. Observation on the application of de-opioid anesthesia and analgesia based on the concept of accelerated recovery surgery in the perioperative period of emergency cesarean section[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2023, 32(2): 166-172.] DOI: 10.19960/j.issn.1005-0698.202302006.

17.Sucato DJ, Lovejoy JF, Ageawal S, et al. Postoperative ketorolac does not predispose to pseudoarthrosis following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(10): 1119-1124. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f6a2a.

18.李智卓, 时利军, 高福强, 等. 自噬相关信号转导通路在骨代谢中的作用[J]. 医学新知, 2022, 32(1): 64-68. [Li ZZ, Shi LJ, Gao FQ, Sun W. The role of autophagy related signal transduction pathways in bone metabolism[J]. Yixue Xinzhi Zazhi, 2022, 32(1): 64-68.] DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1004-5511.202011032.

19.Mcnicol ED, Rowe E, Cooper TE. Ketorolac for postoperative pain in children[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 7(7): CD012294. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012294.pub2.

20.De Oliveira GS, Agarwal D, Benzon HT. Perioperative single dose ketorolac to prevent postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. Anesth Analg, 2012, 114(2): 424-433. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182334d68.

21.Marzuillo P, Calligaris L, Amoroso S, et al. Narrative review shows that the short-term use of ketorolac is safe and effective in the management of moderate-to-severe pain in children[J]. Acta Paediatr, 2018, 107(4): 560-567. DOI: 10.1111/apa.14189.

Popular papers
Last 6 months