Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 30,2026 No.7 Detail

Mechanism study of glycyrrhizin in the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma based on network pharmacology and in vitro cell experiments

Published on Aug. 11, 2026Total Views: 40 times Total Downloads: 7 times Download Mobile

Author: TIAN Zhongjia 1 LEI Yintao 1 LI Junfu 1 WANG Qian 2

Affiliation: 1.Department of Stomatology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Tai'an 271000, Shandong Province, China 2.School of Stomatology, Zunyi Medical University, Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Disease Research and Zunyi Key Laboratory of Oral Disease Research, Zunyi 563000, Guizhou Province, China

Keywords: Glycyrrhizin Oral squamous cell carcinoma Network pharmacology Molecular docking Notch signaling pathway

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202512047

Reference: TIAN Zhongjia,LEI Yintao,LI Junfu,WANG Qian. Mechanism study of glycyrrhizin in the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma based on network pharmacology and in vitro cell experiments[J]. Frontiers in Pharmaceutical Sciences,2026,30(7):1081-1091. DOI:10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202512047[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective To investigate the potential molecular mechanisms of glycyrrhizin in the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) by integrating network pharmacology, molecular docking, and in vitro experiments.

Methods Glycyrrhizin targets were obtained from PubChem, SwissTargetPrediction, and TargetNet databases. OSCC-associated genes were retrieved from GeneCards and OMIM databases, and overlapping targets were identified as candidate therapeutic targets. A protein-protein interaction network was constructed using the STRING database and Cytoscape software to screen hub targets. Gene ontology (GO) functional annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses were performed using ClueGO. Survival analysis was conducted based on the TISIDB database to identify prognosis-related key genes. Molecular docking validation was performed using AutoDock Vina. In vitro experiments were carried out in HSC-3 cells to validate the anti-tumor activity of glycyrrhizin and its regulatory effects on signaling pathways.

Results A total of 37 common targets of glycyrrhizin and OSCC were identified. Protein-protein interaction network analysis identified STAT3, JUN, MMP9, AR, BCL2L1, IL2, PSEN1, MMP2, CYP2D6, and TLR9 as hub targets. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that candidate targets were mainly enriched in biological processes, including vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation, Notch signaling regulation, and immune response modulation, as well as signaling pathways such as the Notch signaling pathway and neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction. Survival analysis demonstrated that patients with high expression of PSEN1 and TLR9 had significantly shorter median survival times compared with low-expression groups (PSEN1: 1.8 vs. 3.2 years, P=0.004 62; TLR9: 2.1 vs. 4.5 years, P=0.000 483), suggesting that high expression of both genes was significantly associated with poor prognosis in patients. Molecular docking revealed favorable binding affinity between glycyrrhizin and both PSEN1 and TLR9. In vitro experiments confirmed that glycyrrhizin inhibited HSC-3 cell proliferation and downregulated the expression of key proteins in the Notch signaling pathway.

Conclusion This study preliminarily elucidates the potential molecular mechanism of glycyrrhizin in intervening in OSCC from multiple perspectives. Its anti-tumor effects may be associated with the regulation of the Notch signaling pathway and immune-related processes, providing a theoretical basis for further mechanism exploration and translational research.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1. MonteroPH, PatelSG. Cancer of the oral cavity[J]. Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 2015, 24(3): 491-508. DOI:10.1016/j.soc.2015.03.006.

2. BrayF, FerlayJ, SoerjomataramI, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492.

3. SungH, FerlayJ, SiegelR L, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660.

4. DE feliceF, DE vincentiisM, ValentiniV, et al. Follow-up program in head and neck cancer[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2017, 113: 151-155. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.03.012.

5. KeamB, MachielsJP, KimHR, et al. Pan-Asian adaptation of the EHNS-ESMO-ESTRO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck[J]. ESMO Open, 2021, 6(6): 100309. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100309.

6. CheraghlouS, SchettinoA, ZoggCK, et al. Changing prognosis of oral cancer: An analysis of survival and treatment between 1973 and 2014[J]. Laryngoscope, 2018, 128(12): 2762-2769. DOI: 10.1002/lary.27315.

7. XiangY, GuoZ, ZhuP, et al. Traditional Chinese medicine as a cancer treatment: Modern perspectives of ancient but advanced science[J]. Cancer Med, 2019, 8(5): 1958-1975. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2108.

8. 清·孙星衍, 孙冯翼, 重辑. 神农本草经[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 1963: 18.

9. RoohbakhshA, IranshahyM, IranshahiM. Glycyrrhetinic acid and its derivatives: anti-cancer and cancer chemopreventive properties, mechanisms of action and structure- cytotoxic activity relationship[J]. Curr Med Chem, 2016, 23(5): 498-517. DOI: 10.2174/0929867323666160112122256.

10. KhanR, REhmanMU, KhanAQ, et al. Glycyrrhizic acid suppresses 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon tumorigenesis in Wistar rats: Alleviation of inflammatory, proliferation, angiogenic, and apoptotic markers[J]. Environ Toxicol, 2018, 33(12): 1272-1283. DOI: 10.1002/tox.22635.

11. SunZP, TanZG, PengC, et al. HK2 is associated with the Warburg effect and proliferation in liver cancer: Targets for effective therapy with glycyrrhizin[J]. Mol Med Rep, 2021, 23(5): 343. DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2021.11982.

12. WuX, WangW, ChenY, et al. Glycyrrhizin suppresses the growth of human NSCLC cell line HCC827 by downregulating HMGB1 level[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018: 6916797. DOI: 10.1155/2018/6916797.

13. ZhangR, ZhuX, BaiH, et al. Network pharmacology databases for traditional Chinese medicine: review and assessment[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2019, 10: 123. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00123.

14. LiS, ZhangB. Traditional Chinese medicine network pharmacology: theory, methodology and application[J]. Chin J Nat Med, 2013, 11(2): 110-120. DOI: 10.1016/S1875-5364(13)60037-0.

15. KatariaR, KhatkarA. Molecular docking of natural phenolic compounds for the screening of urease inhibitors[J]. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 2019, 20(5): 410-421. DOI: 10.2174/1389201020666190409110948.

16. SaikiaS, BordoloiM. Molecular docking: challenges, advances and its use in drug discovery perspective[J]. Curr Drug Targets, 2019, 20(5): 501-521. DOI: 10.2174/1389450119666181022153016.

17. GfellerD, GrosdidierA, WirthM, et al. SwissTargetPrediction: a web server for target prediction of bioactive small molecules[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2014, 42(Web Server issue): W32-38.DOI:10.1093/nar/gku293.

18. StelzerG, RosenN, PlaschkesI, et al. The GeneCards suite: from gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses[J]. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics, 2016, 54: 1.30.1-1.30.33. DOI: 10.1002/cpbi.530.

19. SzklarczykD, MorrisJH, CookH, et al. The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2017, 45(D1): D362-D368. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw937.

20. AshburnerM, BallCA, BlakeJA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium[J]. Nat Genet, 2000, 25(1): 25-29. DOI: 10.1038/75556.

21. WixonJ, KellD. The Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes--KEGG[J]. Yeast, 2000, 17(1): 48-55.DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(200004)17:1<48::AID-YEA2>3.0.CO;2-H.

22. RuB, WongCN, TongY, et al. TISIDB: an integrated repository portal for tumor-immune system interactions[J]. Bioinformatics, 2019, 35(20): 4200-4202. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz210.

23. MorrisGM, HueyR, LindstromW, et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility[J]. J Comput Chem, 2009, 30(16): 2785-2791. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21256.

24. TrottO, OlsonAJ. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading[J]. J Comput Chem, 2010, 31(2): 455-461. DOI:10.1002/jcc.21334.

25. LiX, XuX, WangJN, et al. A system-level investigation into the mechanisms of Chinese traditional medicine: compound Danshen formula for cardiovascular disease treatment[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(9): e43918. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043918.

26. HeLH, WangXR, MaQ ,et al. Glycyrrhizin inhibits the invasion and metastasis of breast cancer cells via upregulation of expressions of miR-200c and E-cadherin[J].Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2020, 9: 1807. DOI: 10.4314/TJPR.V19I9.2.

27. GigliottiJ, MadathilS, MakhoulN. Delays in oral cavity cancer[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2019, 48(9): 1131-1137. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.02.015.

28. RenZH, HuCY, HeHR, et al. Global and regional burdens of oral cancer from 1990 to 2017: Results from the global burden of disease study[J]. Cancer Commun (Lond), 2020, 40(2-3): 81-92.DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12009.

29. KatoT, HinoS, HorieN, et al. Anti-UV activity of Kampo medicines and constituent plant extracts: re-evaluation with skin keratinocyte system[J]. In Vivo, 2014, 28(4): 571-578. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24982224/.

30. CuiX, YangY, YanAH. MiR-654-3p constrains proliferation, invasion, and migration of sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma via CREB1/PSEN1 Regulatory Axis[J]. Front Genet, 2021, 12: 799933. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.799933.

31. LiP, LinX, ZhangJR, et al. The expression of presenilin 1 enhances carcinogenesis and metastasis in gastric cancer[J]. Oncotarget, 2016, 7(9): 10650-10662. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7298.

32. MengF, QianLT, LYU L, et al. miR-193a-3p regulation of chemoradiation resistance in oesophageal cancer cells via the PSEN1 gene[J]. Gene, 2016, 579(2): 139-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.12.060.

33. DengH, LyuL, LiY, et al. The miR-193a-3p regulated PSEN1 gene suppresses the multi-chemoresistance of bladder cancer[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2015, 1852(3): 520-528. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.12.014.

34. HasnatS, HujanenR, NwaruBI, et al. The prognostic value of toll-like receptors in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2020, 21(19): 7255. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21197255.

35. MinR, ZunZ, SiyiL, et al. Increased expression of Toll-like receptor-9 has close relation with tumour cell proliferation in oral squamous cell carcinoma[J]. Arch Oral Biol, 2011, 56(9): 877-884. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.01.010.

36. PisaniLP, EstadellaD, RibeiroDA. The role of toll like receptors (TLRs) in oral carcinogenesis[J]. Anticancer Res, 2017, 37(10): 5389-5394. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11965.

37. SunWY, GaykalovaDA, OchsMF, et al. Activation of the NOTCH pathway in head and neck cancer[J]. Cancer Res, 2014, 74(4): 1091-1104. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1259.

Popular papers
Last 6 months