Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 30,2026 No.8 Detail

Opioid dose conversion: integration of multiple evidence sources and clinical practice considerations—a narrative review

Published on Sep. 04, 2026Total Views: 1597 times Total Downloads: 307 times Download Mobile

Author: SU Huifang 1, 2 LIU Jinyu 1

Affiliation: 1.Department of Pharmacy, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430033, China 2.Department of Pharmacy, Ganzhou Hospital-Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University (Ganzhou People's Hospital), Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi Province, China

Keywords: Opioids Dose conversion Oral morphine equivalents Individualized dose adjustment Pain management

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202605059

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Opioids play an important role in the management of moderate-to-severe pain; however, no universally accepted conversion standard is available across different opioids, formulations, and routes of administration, and conversion factors vary among clinical guidelines, expert consensus statements, and professional reference tools. This narrative review with descriptive evidence synthesis, focusing on the clinical application of opioid dose conversion, integrates recommendations from domestic and international guidelines, expert consensus statements, professional organizations, institutional clinical algorithms, pharmaceutical databases, and specialty conversion tools. Oral morphine equivalent (OME) conversion factors for commonly used oral, parenteral, and special opioid formulations were compared and descriptively summarized, and specific conversion scenarios such as transdermal fentanyl, methadone, buprenorphine, intrathecal administration, and other complex conversion scenarios. The findings show that conversion factors from different sources are relatively consistent for some opioids, whereas substantial variation remains for certain drugs and routes of administration. Fixed linear conversion is particularly inappropriate when dose-dependent, formulation-specific, or nonlinear conversion strategies are required. Opioid equivalence calculations should be used primarily for initial dose estimation. In clinical practice, incomplete cross-tolerance, previous opioid exposure, reasons for switching, organ function, concomitant medications, and individual risk factors should be considered, followed by timely reassessment and dose titration. By comparing conversion recommendations across multiple evidence sources and their scope of application, this review provides a practical reference for standardized and individualized opioid conversion in clinical practice.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1. NielsenS, DegenhardtL, HobanB, et al. A synthesis of oral morphine equivalents (OME) for opioid utilisation studies[J]. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf, 2016, 25(6): 733-737. DOI: 10.1002/pds.3945.

2. FinePG, PortenoyRK. Establishing "best practices" for opioid rotation: conclusions of an expert panel[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2009, 38(3): 418-425. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.06.002.

3. 中国抗癌协会癌痛整合治疗专业委员会. 中国成人癌痛诊疗指南(2025版)[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2025, 105(36): 3148-3174.Cancer Pain Integrated Treatment Professional Committee of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association. Chinese guidelines for cancer pain management in adults (2025 edition)[J]. National Medical Journal of China, 2025, 105(36): 3148-3174. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20250515-01191.

4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Adult Cancer Pain. Version 1.2026[EB/OL]. (2026-01-23)[2026-04-17]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/guidelines-detail?category=3&id=1413.

5. CaraceniA, HanksG, KaasaS, et al. Use of opioid analgesics in the treatment of cancer pain: evidence-based recommendations from the EAPC[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2012, 13(2): e58-e68. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70040-2.

6. DavisMP, DaviesA, McPhersonML, et al. Opioid conversion in adults with cancer: MASCC-ASCO-AAHPM-HPNA-NICSO guideline[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2025, 33(3): 243. DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09286-z.

7. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Cancer Pain-Adult: Clinical Management Algorithm[EB/OL]. (2025-07-15)[2026-04-17]. https://www.mdanderson.org/documents/for-physicians/algorithms/clinical-management/clin-management-cancer-pain-web-algorithm.pdf.

8. Specialist Pharmacy Service. Estimating dose equivalence from oral morphine to other opioids[EB/OL]. (2025-04-01)[2026-04-17]. https://www.sps.nhs.uk/articles/estimating-dose-equivalence-from-oral-morphine-to-other-opioids/.

9. DowellD, RaganKR, JonesCM, et al. CDC Clinical Practice Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Pain—United States, 2022[J]. MMWR Recomm Rep, 2022, 71(3): 1-95. DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7103a1.

10. Faculty of Pain Medicine, Royal College of Anaesthetists. Dose equivalents and changing opioids[EB/OL]. (2023)[2026-04-17]. https://fpm.ac.uk/opioids-aware-structured-approach-opioid-prescribing/dose-equivalents-and-changing-opioids.

11. Faculty of Pain Medicine, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. PS01(PM) Appendix 2: Opioid Dose Equivalence Calculation Table[EB/OL]. (2025-10)[2026-04-17]. https://www.anzca.edu.au/safety-and-advocacy/opioid-calculator.

12. Therapeutic Guidelines Limited. eTG complete: Analgesic Guidelines[DB/OL]. (2013)[2026-04-17]. http://www.tg.org.au/?sectionid=71.

13. Australian Medicines Handbook Pty Ltd. Australian Medicines Handbook 2013 online: Opioid comparison[EB/OL]. (2013)[2026-04-17].http://www.amh.net.au/online/view.php?page=chapter3/tablecomp-inf-opioid.tb.html. doi:10.18773/austprescr.2004.095

14. IncLexi-Comp. Drug Information Handbook, 23rd ed[M]. Hudson, OH: Lexi-Comp Inc., 2014: 1-2422.

15. Truven Health Analytics Inc. Micromedex 2.0[DB/OL]. (2015)[2026-04-17]. http://www.micromedexsolutions.com/.

16. MarkhamA. Oliceridine: first approval[J]. Drugs, 2020, 80(16): 1739-1744. DOI: 10.1007/s40265-020-01414-9.

17. 徐建国, 罗爱伦, 吴新民, 等. 地佐辛术后镇痛专家建议[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2013, 29(9): 921-922. [XuJG, LuoAL, WuXM, et al. Expert recommendations on postoperative analgesia with dezocine[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2013, 29(9): 921-922.https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/CiBQZXJpb2RpY2FsQ0hJU29scjkyMDI2MDcyNzAzMTgxMhIQbGNtenh6ejIwMTMwOTAzMxoIa292NDRtang%3D.

18. UnlugencH, VardarMA, TetikerS. A comparative study of the analgesic effect of patient-controlled morphine, pethidine, and tramadol for postoperative pain management after abdominal hysterectomy[J]. Anesth Analg, 2008, 106(1): 309-312. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000287815.32869.2A.

19. 中国医师协会疼痛科医师分会, 国家卫生健康委能力建设和继续教育中心癌痛全程管理专家组. 癌痛全程管理中国专家共识(2025版)[J]. 中国疼痛医学杂志, 2025, 31(9): 643-657.Pain Physicians Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association, Expert Group for Whole-Course Cancer Pain Management of the Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center, National Health Commission. Chinese expert consensus on whole-course management of cancer pain (2025 edition)[J]. Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine, 2025, 31(9): 643-657. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9852.2025.09.002.

20. BabulN, ProvencherL, LabergeF, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of controlled-release morphine suppositories and tablets in cancer pain[J]. J Clin Pharmacol, 1998, 38(1): 74-81. DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1998.tb04380.x.

21. HermannsH, BosEME, Van ZuylenML, et al. The options for neuraxial drug administration[J]. CNS Drugs, 2022, 36(8): 877-896. DOI: 10.1007/s40263-022-00936-y.

22. DeerTR, PopeJE, HayekSM, et al. The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC): recommendations on intrathecal drug infusion systems best practices and guidelines[J]. Neuromodulation, 2017, 20(2): 96-132. DOI: 10.1111/ner.12538.

23. DeerTR, HayekSM, GriderJS, et al. The Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference (PACC)®: intrathecal drug delivery guidance on safety and therapy optimization when treating chronic noncancer pain[J]. Neuromodulation, 2024, 27(7): 1107-1139. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurom.2024.03.003.

24. JefferyMM, HootenWM, HessEP, et al. Opioid prescribing for opioid-naive patients in emergency departments and other settings: characteristics of prescriptions and association with long-term use[J]. Ann Emerg Med, 2018, 71(3): 326-336.e19. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.042.

25. McPhersonML, WalkerKA, DavisMP, et al. Safe and appropriate use of methadone in hospice and palliative care: expert consensus white paper[J]. J Pain Symptom Manage, 2019, 57(3): 635-645.e4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.001.

26. KharaschED. Current concepts in methadone metabolism and transport[J]. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev, 2017, 6(2): 125-134. DOI: 10.1002/cpdd.326.

27. ChouR, CrucianiRA, FiellinDA, et al. Methadone safety: a clinical practice guideline from the American Pain Society and College on Problems of Drug Dependence, in collaboration with the Heart Rhythm Society[J]. J Pain, 2014, 15(4): 321-337. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2014.01.494.

28. WallaceL, KadakiaA. Buprenorphine transdermal system utilization[J]. Postgrad Med, 2017, 129(1): 81-86. DOI: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1267537.

29. GudinJ, FudinJ. A narrative pharmacological review of buprenorphine: a unique opioid for the treatment of chronic pain[J]. Pain Ther, 2020, 9(1): 41-54. DOI: 10.1007/s40122-019-00143-6.

30. CrisafulliS, BateA, BrownJS, et al. Interplay of spontaneous reporting and longitudinal healthcare databases for signal management: position statement from the Real-World Evidence and Big Data Special Interest Group of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance[J]. Drug Saf, 2025, 48(9): 959-976. DOI: 10.1007/s40264-025-01548-3.

31. NguyenM, LedanS, ChengC, et al. Impact of clinical decision support within the electronic medical record on opioid prescribing and dispensing[J]. Perm J, 2023, 27(4): 64-71. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/23.063.

32. Pg Abdul Haris DNNB, Sze HuiA, IslamN, et al. The role of the multidisciplinary team for opioid stewardship: a scoping review[J]. J Multidiscip Healthc, 2025, 18: 7797-7810. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S548884.

Popular papers
Last 6 months