Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 30,2026 No.9 Detail

Efficacy evaluation and quality of life analysis of cadonilimab combined with bevacizumab biosimilar and chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Published on Oct. 01, 2026Total Views: 663 times Total Downloads: 169 times Download Mobile

Author: ZHANG Xiaoqing 1 LIU Shuai 2 ZHANG Kai 1 HE Jing 1 WANG Yuchao 1 ZHANG Juan 1 LUAN Wei 1

Affiliation: 1.Department of Medical Oncology, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot 010017, China 2.Day Ward, Inner Mongolia Armed Police Hospital, Hohhot 010041, China

Keywords: Cadonilimab Bevacizumab Metastatic colorectal cancer Efficacy evaluation RAS-mutated Progression-free survival Objective response rate Disease control rate

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202606069

Reference: ZHANG Xiaoqing,LIU Shuai,ZHANG Kai,HE Jing,WANG Yuchao,ZHANG Juan,LUAN Wei. Efficacy evaluation and quality of life analysis of cadonilimab combined with bevacizumab biosimilar and chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Frontiers in Pharmaceutical Sciences,2026,30(9):1538-1548. DOI:10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202606069[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab combined with bevacizumab biosimilar and chemotherapy (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for RAS-mutated, microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods Using a prospective, single-arm exploratory study, patients with RAS-mutated, MSS mCRC who visited the People's Hospital of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region from April 2024 to April 2025 were selected. They received chemotherapy with 250 mg of cadonilimab plus 5-7.5 mg/kg of bevacizumab and FOLFOX/FOLFIRI regimens. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), as well as PFS rates at 3, 6, and 12 months and the incidence of adverse reactions. Additionally, the quality of life of patients before and after treatment was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scale. Results A total of 32 patients were enrolled, with an ORR of 53.1% and a DCR of 96.9% after treatment. The median PFS was 11.4 months, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of (9.6, 13.5) months. The median overall survival was not reached. The PFS rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 96.9%, 90.6%, and 46.9%, respectively. Common adverse reactions after treatment included myelosuppression, vomiting/nausea, hand-foot syndrome, and endocrine toxicity. Most adverse reactions were grade 1 to 2, with a few being grade 3. No grade 4 to 5 adverse reactions occurred. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score ≥ 2, primary cancer site in the right-sided colon, and concurrent liver metastasis had significantly poorer prognosis (P < 0.05). The EORTC QLQ-C30 scale assessment showed improvements in patients' overall health status and functional domains, with core symptoms significantly alleviated. Conclusion In the first-line treatment of RAS-mutated, MSS mCRC, the treatment regimen combining cadonilimab with bevacizumab analogues and chemotherapy showed certain benefits in key efficacy endpoints such as ORR and PFS, with manageable overall safety. No new or intolerable toxicities were observed, and it has advantages for patients with ECOG scores of 0-1, with a primary tumor in the left-sided colon, and without liver metastasis. Due to limitations such as a small sample size and short follow-up time, large-scale clinical studies should be conducted in the future for further exploration and verification.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1. SungH, FerlayJ, SiegelRL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660.

2. Bekall-SaabT. A decade of progress: advances in the third-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Am J Manag Care, 2024, 30(Suppl.2): S23-S30. DOI: 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89545.

3. XuJ, TangZ. Progress on angiogenic and antiangiogenic agents in the tumor microenvironment[J]. Front Oncol, 2024, 14: 1491099. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1491099.

4. LiF, LinY, LiR, et al. Molecular targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: current and evolving approaches[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2023, 14(000): 11. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1165666.

5. 张晓玲, 范文轩, 杜云毅, 等. 微卫星稳定/错配修复完整型结直肠癌的免疫联合治疗进展[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2024, 46(8): 725-736.ZhangXL, FanWX, DuYY, et al. Application of immune combination therapy in MSS/pMMR-type colorectal cancer: current status and future perspectives[J]. Chinese Journal of Oncology, 2024, 46(8): 725-736. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20230904-00116.

6. WookeyV, GrotheyA. Update on the role of pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Ther Adv Gastroenterol, 2021, 14: 17562848211024460. DOI: 10.1177/17562848211024460.

7. GomarM, NajafiM, AghiliM, et al. Durable complete response to pembrolizumab in microsatellite stable colorectal cancer[J]. Daru, 2021, 29: 501-506. DOI: 10.1007/s40199-021-00404-w.

8. AntoniottiC, BorelliB, RossiniD, et al. Atezo-TRIBE: a randomised phase Ⅱ study of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab alone or in combination with atezolizumab as initial therapy for patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. BMC Cancer, 2020, 20(1): 683. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07169-6.

9. ThibaudinM, FumetJD, ChibaudelB, et al. First-line durvalumab and tremelimumab with chemo-therapy in RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 1b/2 trial[J]. Nat Med, 2023, 29(8): 2087-2098. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02497-z.

10. ZhangT, LinY, GaoQ. Bispecific antibodies targeting immunomodulatory checkpoints for cancer therapy[J]. Cancer Biol Med, 2023, 20(3): 181-195. DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0002.

11. GaoX, XuN, LiZ, et al. Safety and antitumour activity of cadonilimab, an anti-PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody, for patients with advanced solid tumours (COMPASSION-03): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1b/2 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2023, 24(10): 1134-1146. DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00411-4.

12. ShenL, ZhangY, LiZ, et al. First-line cadonilimab plus chemotherapy in HER2-negative advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a randomized, doubleblind, phase 3 trial[J]. Nat Med, 2025, 31(4): 1163-1170. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03450-4.

13. QuW, GaoJ, ZhangB, et al. Efficacy, safety and DNA methylation analysis of cadonilimab combined with taxane and cisplatin as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): updated results from an open-label, multicenter phase II trial (AK104-IIT-014)[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2025, 43(4_suppl): 463. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2025.43.4_suppl.463.

14. ChenQY, GuoSS, LuoY, et al. Efficacy and safety of cadonilimab in previously treated recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (COMPASSION-06): a phase II multicenter study[J]. Oral Oncol, 2024, 151: 106723. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106723.

15. EisenhauerEA, TherasseP, BogaertsJ, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(2): 228-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

16. BuccheriG, FerrignoD, TamburiniM. Karnofsky and ECOG performance status scoring in lung cancer: a prospective,longitudinal study of 536 patients from a single institution[J]. Eur J Cancer, 1996, 32A(7): 1135-1141. DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00664-8.

17. GuanZZ, XuJM, LuoRC, et al. Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase Ⅲ ARTIST trial[J]. Chin J Cancer, 2011, 30(10): 682-689. DOI: 10.5732/cjc.011.10188.

18. HurwitzHI, FehrenbacherL, HainsworthJD, et al. Bevacizumab in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin:an active regimen for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(15): 3502-3508. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.10.017.

19. ParikhAR, LeeFC, YauL, et al. MAVERICC, a randomized, biomarker-stratified, phase Ⅱ study of mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI-bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2019, 25(10): 2988-2995. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1221.

20. SchmollHJ, MannJ, MeinertF, et al. Efficacy and quality of life for FOLFOX/bevacizumab +/- irinote-can in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer-final results of the AIO CHARTA trial[J]. Br J Cancer, 2024, 130(2): 233-241. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02496-4.

21. TangWT, RenL, LiuTS, et al. Bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 versus mFOLFOX6 alone as first-line treat‐ment for RAS mutant unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastases: the BECOME randomized controlled trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2020, 38(27): 3175-3184. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.00174.

22. Freites-martinezA, SantanaN, Arias-santiagoS, et al. Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE - Version 5.0) to evaluate the severity of adverse events of anticancer therapies[J]. Actas Dermosifiliogr, 2021, 112(1): 90-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2019.05.009.

23. AaronsonNK, AhmedzaiS, BergmanB, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1993, 85(5): 365-76. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.

24. HeinemannV, Von WeikersthalLF, DeckerT, et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus be vacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with meta static colorectal cancer(FIRE-3): a randomised, open label, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2014, 15(10): 1065-1075. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70330-4.

25. WangF, DaiG, DengY, et al. Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a prospective, multicenter, observational, non-interventional phase Ⅳ trial[J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2021, 33: 490-499. DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2021.04.06.

26. PragerGW, TaiebJ, FakihM, et al. Trifluridine Tipiracil and Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2023, 388: 1657-1667. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2025.09.024.

27. YangM, CuiM, SunY, et al. Mechanisms, combination therapy, and biomarkers in cancer immunotherapy resistance[J]. Cell Commun Signal, 2024, 22(1): 338. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-024-01711-w.

28. LenzHJ, ParikhA, SpigelDR, et al. Modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab with and without nivolumab for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: phase 2 results from the CheckMate 9X8 randomized clinical trial[J]. J Immunother Cancer, 2024, 12(3): e008409. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008409.

29. GaoZ, WangXY, ShenZG, et al. Real-world comparison of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with or without immunotherapy as first-line therapy in colorectal cancer[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2025, 31(24): 108298. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2023-008409.

30. PangX, HuangZ, ZhongT, et al. Cadonilimab, a tetravalent PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody with trans-binding and enhanced target binding avidity[J]. MAbs, 2023, 15(1): 2180794. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2023.2180794.

31. LiangW, GuoZ, ZhangY, et al. Infusion-related reactions induced by cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody): seven case reports[J]. Case Rep Oncol, 2024, 17(1): 361-369. DOI: 10.1159/000535504.

32. WangY, JiaR, SiH, et al. Efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus bevacizumab and CAPOX as first-line treatment for patients with RAS-mutant, microsatellite stable, metastatic colorectal cancer[J]. BMC Cancer, 2025, 25(1): 422. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-13794-w.

33. GuJ, ZhouJ, ChenQ, et al. Tumor metabolite lactate promotes tumorigenesis by modulating MOESIN lactylation and enhancing TGF-β signaling inregulatory T cells[J]. Cell Rep, 2022, 39: 110986-111004. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111122.

34. 周慧聪, 邵亚娟. 老年肿瘤微环境对免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的影响[J]. 基础医学与临床, 2025, 45(9): 1139-1143.ZhouHC, ShaoYJ. Impact of the aging tumor microenvironment on immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy[J]. Basic & Clinical Medicine, 2025, 45(9): 1139-1143. DOI: 10.16352/j.issn.1001-6325.2025.09.1139.

35. SunY, WuP, ZhangZ, etal. Integrated multi-omics profiling to dissect the spatiotemporal evolution of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Cancer Cell, 2024, 42(1): 135-156.e17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.11.010.

36. SyedAK, WhisenantJG, BarnesSL, et al. Multiparametric analysis of longitudinal quantitative MRI data to identify distinct tumor habitats in preclinical models of breast cancer[J]. Cancers (Basel), 2020, 12(6): 1682. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061682.

37. ShiZ, HuangX, ChengZ, et al. MRI-based quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity for predicting treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer[J]. Radiology, 2023, 308(1): e222830. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.222830.

38. EiOB, HuF, SadekR, et al. Not all immune-checkpoint inhibitors are created equal: Meta-analysis and systematic review of immune-related adverse events in cancer trials[J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2017, 119: 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.09.002.

Popular papers
Last 6 months