Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 29,2025 No.7 Detail

Efficacy and prediction model construction of aripiprazole combined with Sertraline in the treatment of adolescent depression

Published on Jul. 30, 2025Total Views: 60 times Total Downloads: 10 times Download Mobile

Author: YE Haiyan CHEN Liang MIN Guoqing YE Xiaofang

Affiliation: Psychiatric Department 2, Lishui Second People's Hospital, Lishui 323000, Zhejiang Province, China

Keywords: Aripiprazole Sertraline Adolescent depression Treatment efficacy prediction model

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202504090

Reference: YE Haiyan, CHEN Liang, MIN Guoqing, YE Xiaofang. Efficacy and prediction model construction of aripiprazole combined with Sertraline in the treatment of adolescent depression[J]. Yaoxue QianYan Zazhi, 2025, 29(7): 1163-1171. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202504090.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To analyze the influencing factors on the efficacy of aripiprazole (APZ) combined with sertraline (SRT) in the treatment of adolescent depression (AD), and construct a prediction model.

Methods  The clinical data of AD patients from Lishui Second People's Hospital treated with the combination of APZ and SRT were restropectively analyzed. According to the treatment outcomes, the patients were divided into the clinical effectiveness group and the clinical ineffectiveness group. T-test and chi-square test were used to compare the differences of clinical data variables in AD patients; least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was employed to screen the key factors influencing AD treatment efficacy; binary logistic regression was adopted to explore the potential relationships between key factors and AD treatment efficacy; the “rms” package was used to construct the AD treatment efficacy prediction model, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve were plotted to evaluate the performance of the AD treatment efficacy prediction model.

Results  A total of 278 AD patients were enrolled, including 236 in the effective group and 42 in the ineffective group. The clinical effective rate of APZ combined with SRT in the treatment of AD was 84.89% (95%CI: 80.68%, 89.10%). Disease course [OR=19.081, 95%CI (4.551, 80.003), P<0.001], living environment (rural area) [OR=0.08, 95%CI (0.011, 0.605), P=0.014], negative life events (presence) [OR=8.427, 95%CI (1.221, 58.141), P=0.031], Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) score [OR=1.291, 95%CI (1.112, 1.754), P=0.011], and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) level [OR=7.854, 95%CI (2.71, 22.758), P<0.001] were predictive factors for the efficacy of APZ combined with SRT in treating AD patients. ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of the AD treatment efficacy prediction model for predicting the ineffectiveness of APZ combined with SRT treatment was 0.988 (0.975, 1.000). The calibration curve demonstrated that the "predicted probability" and the "actual probability" of the ineffectiveness of APZ combined with SRT treatment were basically consistent.

Conclusion  This study successfully constructed a prediction model for the efficacy of APZ combined with SRT in the treatment of AD, which may help with the clinical diagnosis and treatment of AD patients.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.张莉. 儿童青少年抑郁症特征和研究现状[J]. 中国临床康复, 2006, 10(42): 159-162. [Zhang L. Present study on the characteristics of depression in children and adolescents[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2006, 10(42): 159-162.] DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2006.42.067.

2.Yang E, Chen F, Yang Y, et al. Global trends in depressive disorder prevalence and DALYs among young populations: a comprehensive analysis from 1990 to 2021[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2024, 24(1): 943. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06419-2.

3.Thapar A, Collishaw S, Pine DS, et al. Depression in adolescence[J]. Lancet, 2012, 379(9820): 1056-1067. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60871-4.

4.段桂花, 陈福新. 阿立哌唑的临床应用研究进展[J]. 中国药物评价, 2013, 30(1): 24-26. [Duan GH, Chen FX. Research progress of clinical application for aripiprazole[J]. Chinese Journal of Drug Evaluation, 2013, 30(1): 24-26.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3593. 2013.01.008.

5.卢绍龙, 吴迎春, 张红岩, 等. 阿立哌唑与舍曲林联合治疗青少年抑郁症的效果研究[J]. 当代医学, 2021, 27(33): 139-141. [Lu SL, Wu YC, Zhang HY, et al. The effect of aripiprazole and sertraline in the treatment of adolescent depression[J]. Contemporary Medicine, 2021, 27(33): 139-141.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2021.33.058.

6.李斌. 舍曲林联合小剂量阿立哌唑治疗青少年抑郁障碍临床疗效观察[J]. 海峡药学, 2021, 33(11): 172-174. [Li B. Clinical efficacy observation of sertraline combined with low dose aripiprazole in the treatment of adolescent depression[J]. Strait Pharmaceutical Journal, 2021, 33(11): 172-174.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3765.2021.11.055.

7.Kamijima YT, Yoshihiro. Randomized, double-blind comparison of aripiprazole/sertraline combination and placebo/sertraline combination in patients with major depressive disorder[J]. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 2018, 72(8): 591-601. DOI: 10.1111/pcn.12663.

8.Kaplan SH, Billimek J, Sorkin DH, et al. Who can respond to treatment? Identifying patient characteristics related to heterogeneity of treatment effects[J]. Med Care, 2010, 48(6 Suppl): S9-16. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181d99161.

9.黄书梅. 青少年抑郁症与社会心理因素和家庭环境因素的相关性[J]. 河南医学研究, 2024, 33(20): 3667-3671. [Huang SM. Correlation between adolescent depression and social psychological factors and family environmental factors[J]. Henan Medical Research, 2024, 33(20): 3667-3671.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-437X.2024.20.005.

10.Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: a retrospective[J]. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol, 2011, 73(3): 267-288. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00771.x.

11.莫航沣, 陈亚萍, 韩慧, 等. 临床预测模型研究方法与步骤[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2024, 24(2): 228-236. [Mo HF, Chen YP, Han H, et al. Research methods and steps of clinical prediction models[J]. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2024, 24(2): 228-236.] DOI: 10.7507/1672-2531.202308135.

12.王丹, 周佳, 张玲, 等. 帕罗西汀联合米氮平治疗抑郁症急性期的疗效及其影响因素[J]. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 2021, 21(9): 618-623. [Wang D, Zhou J, Zhang L, et al. Efficacy and its relevant influence factors of paroxetine combined with mirtazapine in treatment of acute depression[J]. Journal of Neuroscience and Mental Health, 2021, 21(9): 618-623.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6574.2021.09.003.

13.沈兴乾, 刘颖钊, 潘慧, 等. 特发性耳鸣伴轻度听力损失患者蒙特利尔认知量表评估[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2024, 38(12): 1134-1139. [Shen XQ, Liu YZ, Pan H, et al. Evaluation of the montreal cognitive assessment in idiopathic tinnitus patients with mild hearing loss[J]. Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, 2024, 38(12): 1134-1139.] DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.12.008.

14.王丹,许颖,申丽娟. 丙戊酸镁联合舍曲林对青少年抑郁症的疗效及其影响因素研究[J]. 精神医学杂志, 2023, 36(3): 273-277. [Wang D, Xu Y, Shen LJ. The efficacy and influencing factors of magnesium valproate combined with sertraline in treating adolescent depression[J]. Journal of Psychiatry, 2023, 36(3): 273-277.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-9346.2023.03.011.

15.Liu W, Ge T, Leng Y, et al. The role of neural plasticity in depression: from hippocampus to prefrontal cortex[J]. Neural Plast, 2017, 2017: 6871089. DOI: 10.1155/2017/6871089.

16.魏海燕, 王士安, 王君, 等. 耳迷走神经埋针治疗轻中度青少年抑郁症的疗效及复发风险因素分析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2024, 53(3): 205-208. [Wei HY, Wang SA, Wang J, et al. Efficacy and recurrence risk factors analysis of auriculotemporal nerve needle insertion for treating mild to moderate adolescent depression[J]. Shanxi Medical Journal, 2024, 53(3): 205-208.]DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2024.03.010.

17.Low NC, Dugas E, O'Loughlin E, et al. Common stressful life events and difficulties are associated with mental health symptoms and substance use in young adolescents[J]. BMC Psychiatry, 2012, 12: 116. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-116.

18.Herman JP, Mcklveen JM, Ghosal S, et al. Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical stress response[J]. Compr Physiol, 2016, 6(2): 603-621. DOI: 10.1002/cphy.c150015.

19.Karin O, Raz M, Tendler A, et al. A new model for the HPA axis explains dysregulation of stress hormones on the timescale of weeks[J]. Mol Syst Biol, 2020, 16(7): e9510. DOI: 10.15252/msb.20209510.

20.Groen RN, Oisín R, Wigman JTW, et al. Comorbidity between depression and anxiety: assessing the role of bridge mental states in dynamic psychological networks[J]. BMC Med, 2020, 18(1): 308. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01738-z.

21.Gosmann NP, Costa MDA, Jaeger MDB, et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors for anxiety, obsessive-compulsive, and stress disorders: a 3-level network meta-analysis[J]. PLoS Med, 2021, 18(6): e1003664. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003664.

22.Boato F, Rosenberger K, Nelissen S, et al. Absence of IL-1β positively affects neurological outcome, lesion development and axonal plasticity after spinal cord injury[J]. J Neuroinflammation, 2013, 10: 6. DOI: 10.1186/1742-2094-10-6.

Popular papers
Last 6 months