Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 27,2024 No.1 Detail

Cost-utility analysis of tislelizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Published on Feb. 08, 2024Total Views: 909 times Total Downloads: 417 times Download Mobile

Author: SU Zhan CHE Jinhui PEI Ruifeng

Affiliation: Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Xuzhou Cancer Hospital, Xuzhou 221000, Jiangsu Province, China

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma Tislelizumab Sorafenib Partition survival model Pharmacoeconomic analysis

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202312216

Reference: SU Zhan, CHE Jinhui, PEI Ruifeng.Cost-utility analysis of tislelizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma[J].Zhongguo Yaoshi Zazhi,2024, 27(1):109-116.DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202312216.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To compare the cost-utility of tislelizumab and sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, and to provide a reference for the selection of treatment regimens from the perspective of pharmacoeconomics.

Methods  A partitioned survival model was used to simulate the survival status of patients using tislelizumab or sorafenib within 10 years, and the cost and health output were calculated respectively to obtain the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR). The 3 times China's per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in 2022 was taken as the threshold for willingness to pay (WTP).

Results  During the simulation period, the ICER of tislelizumab versus sorafenib was 280 691.4 yuan/quality-adjusted life year (QALY), which was significantly higher than that of the sorafenib group, which had obvious economic performance. Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the incidence of grade 3 or above adverse reactions in the tislelizumab group, the cost of tislelizumab, and the incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse reactions in the sorafenib group were important factors affecting ICUR. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that tislelizumab had a significant cost-utility advantage when WTP was 3 times GDP, with an economic probability of 81.4%, and the results were robust.

Conclusion For the first-line treatment of advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, tislelizumab has a significant cost-utility advantage over sorafenib.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Mcglynn KA, Petrick JL, El-Serag HB. Epidemiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma[J]. Hepatology, 2021, 73 Suppl 1 (Suppl 1): 4-13. DOI: 10.1002/hep.31288.

2.罗茜茜, 陈佳梅, 石薇, 等. 晚期原发性肝癌靶向及免疫治疗的研究进展[J]. 山东医药, 2023, 63(1): 92-96. [Luo QQ, Chen JM, Shi W, et al. Research progress on targeted and immunotherapy for advanced primary liver cancer[J] Shandong Pharmaceutical, 2023, 63(1): 92-96.]DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2023.01.023.

3.Li L, Yang S, Chen Y, et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus an anti-VEGF antibody as the first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis[J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13: 891008. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.891008.

4.梁安民, 莫钦国, 杨南武, 等. 原发性肝癌的综合治疗--附607例报告[J]. 癌症, 2004, 23(2): 211-214. [Liang AM, Mo QG, Yang NW, et al. Comprehensive treatment of primary liver cancer-with a report of 607 cases[J]. Cancer, 2004, 23(2): 211-214.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-467X.2004.02.023.

5.Yu SJ. A concise review of updated guidelines regarding the management of hepatocellular carcinoma around the world: 2010-2016[J]. Clin Mol Hepatol, 2016, 22(1): 7-17. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2016.22.1.7.

6.Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, et al. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2020, 382(20): 1894-1905. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915745.

7.Lee MS, Ryoo BY, Hsu CH, et al. Atezolizumab with or without bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (GO30140): an open-label, multicentre, phase 1b study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2020, 21(6): 808-820. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30156-X.

8.Wen F, Zheng H, Zhang P, et al. Atezolizumab and bevacizumab combination compared with sorafenib as the first-line systemic treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis in China and the United states[J]. Liver Int, 2021, 41(5): 1097-1104. DOI: 10.1111/liv.14795.

9.Benson AB, D'angelica MI, Abbott DE, et al. Hepatobiliary Cancers, Version 2. 2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology[J]. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 2021, 19(5): 541-565. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0022.

10.罗详冲, 王周清, 李琼艳, 等. PD-1抑制剂替雷利珠单抗治疗晚期恶性肿瘤的药理作用与临床评价[J]. 协和医学杂志, 2022, 13(4): 679-686. [Luo XC, Wang ZQ, Li QY, et al. Pharmacological effects and clinical evaluation of PD-1 inhibitor tislelizumab in the treatment of advanced malignant tumors[J]. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 2022, 13(4): 679-686.] DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0691.

11.Qin S, Finn RS, Kudo M, et al. RATIONALE 301 study: tislelizumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Future Oncol, 2019, 15(16): 1811-1822. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2019-0097.

12.中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO). 免疫检查点抑制剂临床应用指南(2023)[S]. 2023.

13.石丰豪, 商叶, 芮明军, 等. R语言survHE程序包在卫生经济学评价中的应用[J]. 中国卫生经济, 2020, 39(9): 9-14. [Shi FH, Shang Y, Rui MJ, et al. Application of R language survHE package in health economics evaluation[J]. Chinese Health Economics, 2020, 39(9): 9-14.] DOI: 10.7664/che20200902.

14.Filipovic-Pierucci A, Zarca K, Durand-Zaleski I. Markov models for health economic evaluation modelling in r with the heemod packagE[J]. Value in Health: the Journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2016, 19(7): A369. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.133.

15.曾小慧, 彭六保, 谭重庆, 等. 药物经济学评价中的分区生存模型[J]. 中国新药与临床杂志, 2020, 39(8): 504-507. [Zeng XH, Peng LB, Tan CQ, et al. Zonal survival model in pharmacoeconomic evaluation[J]. Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Medicine, 2020, 39(8): 504-507.] DOI: 10.14109/j.cnki.xyylc.2020.08.12.

16.李文爽, 戴泽琦, 孙庆冉, 等. 2018-2022年我国中药药物经济学研究文献的质量评价[J]. 中国药房, 2023, 34(19): 2378-2384. [Li WS, Dai ZQ, Sun QR, et al. Quality evaluation of pharmacoeconomics research literature in Chinese medicine from 2018 to 2022[J]. China Pharmacy, 2023, 34(19): 2378-2384.] DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.19.13.

17.中国药学会. 《中国药物经济学评价指南2020》[S]. 2020.

18.Guan H, Wang C, Zhao Z, et al. Cost-effectiveness of donafenib as first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in China[J]. Adv Ther, 2022, 39(7): 3334-3346. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02185-3.

19.Zhao M, Pan X, Yin Y, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of five systemic treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in China: an economic evaluation based on network meta-analysis[J]. Front Public Health, 2022, 10: 869960. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.869960.

20.Zhang P, Yang Y, Wen F, et al. Cost-effectiveness of sorafenib as a first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2015, 27(7): 853-859. DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000373.

21.Ren Z, Xu J, Bai Y, et al. Sintilimab plus a bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) versus sorafenib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (ORIENT-32): a randomised, open-label, phase 2-3 study[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2021, 22(7): 977-990. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00252-7.

22.文恩辉, 高川, 董娟妮, 等. 替雷利珠单抗单药二线治疗晚期或转移性食管鳞状细胞癌的成本-效用分析[J]. 中国药房, 2023, 34(5): 581-586. [Wen EH, Gao C, Dong JN, et al. Cost-utility analysis of tislelizumab monotherapy in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma[J]. China Pharmacy, 2023, 34(5): 581-586.] DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.05.13.

23.Liao W, Huang J, Hutton D, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cabozantinib as second-line therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Liver Int, 2019, 39(12): 2408-2416. DOI: 10.1111/liv.14257.

24.Qin S, Kudo M, Meyer T, et al. Tislelizumab vs. sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Oncol, 2023, 9(12): 1651-1659. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.4003.

25.王耀民, 李亚玲. 分子靶向药物治疗肝细胞癌的研究进展[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2023, 44(6): 915-924. [Wang YM, Li YL. Research progress of molecularly targeted drugs in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Journal of Sun Yat-Sen University (Medical Science Edition), 2023, 44(6): 915-924.] DOI: 10.13471/j.cnki.j.sun.yat-sen.univ(med.sci).2023.0605.

26.徐歌瀚. 免疫检查点抑制剂治疗肝细胞癌的研究进展[J]. 中国肿瘤临床, 2023, 50(11): 587-592. [Xu GH. Research progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2023, 50(11): 587-592.] DOI: 10.12354/j.issn.1000-8179.2023.20230085.

27.Ren Z, Ducreux M, Abou-Alfa G K, et al. Tislelizumab in patients with previously treated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (RATIONALE-208): a multicenter, non-randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial[J]. Liver Cancer, 2023, 12(1): 72-84. DOI: 10.1159/000527175.

28.周炜, 蒋俊杰, 王法财, 等. 替雷利珠单抗致免疫相关性脑炎一例[J]. 临床药物治疗杂志, 2023, 21(8): 90-92. [Zhou W, Jiang JJ, Wang FC, et al. Immune-associated encephalitis caused by tislelizumab: a case[J]. Journal of Clinical Pharmacotherapy, 2023, 21(8): 90-92.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3384.2023.08.017.

29.刘佳佳, 王媛媛, 何桂林, 等. 替雷利珠单抗致免疫性心肌炎1例[J]. 医药导报, 2023, 42(4): 606-608. [Liu JJ, Wang YY, He GL, et al. Tislelizumab-induced immune myocarditis: a case[J]. Herald of Medicine, 2023, 42(4): 606-608.] DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1004-0781.2023.04.029.

30.刘广洲, 刘晓敏, 杨伟. 替雷利珠单抗致免疫相关性结肠炎1例[J]. 吉林医药学院学报, 2023, 44(6): 424-425. [Liu GZ, Liu XM, Yang W. Tislelizumab-induced immune-related colitis: 1 case[J]. Journal of Jilin University of Medicine, 2023, 44(6): 424-425.] DOI: 10.13845/j.cnki.issn1673-2995.2023.06.018.

Popular papers
Last 6 months