Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 29,2025 No.6 Detail

Clinical efficacy and influencing factors of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus combined with polyethylene glycol on the bowel preparation quality in patients with chronic constipation

Published on Jun. 28, 2025Total Views: 60 times Total Downloads: 10 times Download Mobile

Author: ZHENG Fei ZHOU Yan LAN Qiangfang SHAO Wei

Affiliation: Department of Gastroenterology, Putuo District People's Hospital of Zhoushan City, Zhoushan 316100, Zhejiang Province, China

Keywords: Bifidobacterium Lactobacillus and Enterococcus Polyethylene glycol Chronic constipation Bowel preparation Bowel preparation failure Intestinal flora

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202503098

Reference: ZHENG Fei, ZHOU Yan, LAN Qiangfang, SHAO Wei. Clinical efficacy and influencing factors of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus combined with polyethylene glycol on the bowel preparation quality in patients with chronic constipation[J]. Yaoxue QianYan Zazhi, 2025, 29(6): 1010-1015. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202503098.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the clinical efficacy and influencing factors of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus powder combined with polyethylene glycol on the  bowel preparation quality in patients with chronic constipation.

Methods  The clinical data of patients with chronic constipation who visited the Endoscopy Center of Putuo District People's Hospital of Zhoushan City from January 2021 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the patients' bowel preparation medication, they were divided into a probiotic group (Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus powder+polyethylene glycol) and a control group (polyethylene glycol). The Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups, and univariate and multivariate Logistics regression were used to analyze the influencing factors of bowel preparation failure.

Results  A total of 267 patients with chronic constipation were included, with 142 in the probiotic group and 125 in the control group. The BBPS score (6.49±1.22 vs. 5.53±2.75) and the rate of bowel preparation compliance (76.06% vs. 58.40%) in the probiotic group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P﹤0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that spontaneous bowel movements per week less than 1 [OR=0.41, 95%CI (0.26, 0.64)] and equal to 1 [OR=0.62, 95%CI (0.42, 0.90)], diabetes [OR=0.57, 95%CI (0.40, 0.81)], and dietary fiber intake <25 g [OR=0.49, 95%CI (0.34, 0.70)] were independent risk factors for bowel preparation failure, while the use of probiotics was a protective factor [OR=2.06, 95%CI (1.46, 2.90)]. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion  In patients with chronic constipation, fewer spontaneous bowel movements per week, diabetes, and insufficient dietary fiber intake are independent risk factors for bowel preparation failure. The use of probiotics can significantly improve the cleanliness and compliance rate of bowel preparation without increasing the risk of adverse reactions.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Hagen R, Nguyen MTT, Anderson JC, et al. Navigating bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a comprehensive overview[J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2025, 59(4): 285-297. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000002124.

2.Gimeno-García AZ, Sacramento-Luis D, Ashok-Bhagchandanir, et al. interventions to improve bowel cleansing in colonoscopy[J]. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2025, 19(1): 39-51. DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2025.2450699.

3.Chen HY, Tu MH, Chen MY. Using a mobile health app (colonclean) to enhance the effectiveness of bowel preparation: development and usability study[J]. JMIR Hum Factors, 2025, 12: e58479. DOI: 10.2196/58479.

4.Marchildon M, Jackson J, Rankin J. Factors influencing inpatient bowel preparation: a scoping review[J]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2024, 39(12): 2487-2503. DOI: 10.1111/jgh.16721.

5.Di Leo M, Iannone A, Arena M, et al. Novel frontiers of agents for bowel cleansing for colonoscopy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2021, 27(45): 7748-7770. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i45.7748.

6.Zhang N, Xu M, Chen X. Establishment of a risk prediction model for bowel preparation failure prior to colonoscopy[J]. BMC Cancer, 2024, 24(1): 341. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12081-4.

7.Szajewska H, Scott KP, de Meij T, et al. Antibiotic-perturbed microbiota and the role of probiotics[J]. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2025, 22(3): 155-172. DOI: 10.1038/s41575-024-01023-x.

8.Drossman DA. Functional gastrointestinal disorders: history, pathophysiology, clinical features and rome IV[J]. Gastroenterology, 2016, 19: S0016-5085(16)00223-7. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.032.

9.Zhang D, Zhao C, Tao Y, et al. Remedial colon hydrotherapy device enema as a salvage strategy for inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study[J]. PLoS One, 2025, 20(3): e0319493. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319493.

10.Shen H, Sun Y, Qian J, et al. Low-residue diet with oral nutritional supplements prior to colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation: an endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Gastroenterol, 2025, 25(1): 166. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-025-03751-z.

11.宋晓伟, 赵小丽. 双歧杆菌四联活菌辅助治疗对慢性乙肝肝硬化患者血清炎症因子和肠道菌群的影响[J]. 中国微生态学杂志, 2024, 36(8): 938-942. [Song XW, Zhao XL. Effects of Bifidobacterium quadruple live bacteria adjuvant therapy on serum inflammatory factors and intestinal flora in patients with chronic hepatitis B cirrhosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Microecology, 2024, 36(8): 938-942.] DOI: 10.13381/j.cnki.cjm.202408011.

12.Høyer KL, Dahl Baunwall SM, Kornum DS, et al. Faecal microbiota transplantation for patients with diabetes type 1 and severe gastrointestinal neuropathy (FADIGAS): a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trialp[J]. EClinicalMedicine, 2024, 79: 103000. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103000.

13.Zhao Y, Zhao F, Liu Q, et al. Randomized controlled trial protocol to analyze the effects of rice with different contents of resistant starch on chronic constipation[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 31177. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82346-2.

14.Schwartz LT, Ladouceur JG, Russell MM, et al. The relationship between fiber intake and gut bacterial diversity and composition during the third trimester of pregnancy[J]. Nutrients, 2025, 17(5): 773. DOI: 10.3390/nu17050773.

15.Rahmani P, Ebrahimi M, Rohani P, et al. Efficacy of lactobacillus reuteri probiotic in the bowel preparation regimen of children candidates for colonoscopy[J]. JGH Open, 2025, 9(2): e70119. DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.70119.

16.Zheng ZL, Zheng QF, Wang LQ, et al. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy: consequences, mechanisms, and treatment of intestinal dysbiosis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2025, 31(2): 100589. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i2.100589.

17.Jo HH, Lee MY, Ha SE, et al. Alteration in gut microbiota after colonoscopy: proposed mechanisms and the role of probiotic interventions[J]. Clin Endosc, 2025, 58(1): 25-39. DOI: 10.5946/ce.2024.147.

18.Cheng J, Gao C, Ala-Jaakkola R, et al. Eight-week supplementation with bifidobacterium lactis HN019 and functional constipation: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2024, 7(10): e2436888. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.36888.

Popular papers
Last 6 months