Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 30,2026 No.1 Detail

Optimization of impurity detection and evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity for lansoprazole for injection

Published on Jan. 31, 2026Total Views: 124 times Total Downloads: 29 times Download Mobile

Author: ZHANG Hao # ZHENG Hang # QIAO Lu CHEN Ji

Affiliation: Hubei Institute for Drug Control, Wuhan 430075, China

Keywords: Lansoprazole Impurities detection High-performance liquid chromatography Cytotoxicity Quality control Method validation Chinese Pharmacopoeia Relative proliferation rates

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202509044

Reference: ZHANG Hao, ZHENG Hang, QIAO Lu, CHEN Ji. Optimization of impurity detection and evaluation of in vitro cytotoxicity for lansoprazole for injection[J]. Yaoxue QianYan Zazhi, 2026, 30(1): 78-86. DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.2097-4922.202509044.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To optimize the chromatographic conditions for major impurities and conduct in vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of impurities in lansoprazole for injection, establish a highly sensitive and specific analytical method for related substances through methodological validation, and reveal its potential biosafety risks. By combinig methodological improvement and toxicity validation, this study provides scientific evidence for enhancing the quality control standards of lansoprazole preparations in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia.

Methods By investigating chromatographic conditions, a novel analytical method for major impurities in lansoprazole was developed and validated through methodological evaluation of specificity, detection limit/quantitation limit, and linearity range. An L929 cytotoxicity evaluation model was established using the MTT colorimetric assay to systematically assess the inhibitory effects of major impurities on cell proliferation. The established analytical method was subsequently applied to determine related substance contents and analyze batch-to-batch variability in multiple production batches of the formulation.

Results  An high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method for simultaneous determination of six lansoprazole impurities was established and validated for system suitability, specificity, linearity, limits of detection, and quantification. Cytotoxicity was ranked as II>I>V>IV>VI>III based on relative proliferation rates derived from absorbance measurements.

Conclusion  Compared with the current method and limit requirements for the determination of related substances of lansoprazole specified in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia, this method optimizes the chromatographic conditions. Furthermore, the established method significantly improved the impurity detection rate in practical sample testing and revealed differences in impurity contents among lansoprazole for injection products manufactured by different enterprises. Notably, impurity II, which exhibited the highest cytotoxicity, was found to have generally high contents in these samples, which further underscores the importance of stringent regulatory oversight.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.Benchamana A, Mori H, Macdougald OA, et al. Regulation of adipocyte differentiation and metabolism by lansoprazole[J]. Life Sci, 239(15): 116897. DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116897.

2.Satoh H. Discovery of lansoprazole and its unique pharmacological properties independent from anti-secretory activity[J]. Curr Pharm Des, 2013, 19(1): 67-75. DOI: 10.2174/138161213803903119.

3.Ji N, Li H, Zhang YX, et al. Lansoprazole (LPZ) reverses multidrug resistance (MDR) in cancer through impeding ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter-mediated. chemotherapeutic drug efflux and lysosomal sequestration[J]. Drug Resist Updat, 2024, 76: 101100. DOI: 10.1016/j.drup.2024.101100.

4.李岩, 贾欢欢, 黄青, 等. 高效液相色谱-高分辨轨道阱质谱联用法对兰索拉唑肠溶制剂的杂质谱研究[J]. 中国药科大学学报, 2023, 54(5): 577-585. [Li Y, Jia HH, Huang Q, et al. Impurity spectra of lansoprazole enteric-coated preparations by high performance liquid chromatography-high resolution orbitatrap mass spectrometry[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2023, 54(5): 577-585.] DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.2023042601.

5.刘文欣, 李岩, 袁耀佐, 等. 多种技术不同维度分析兰索拉唑肠溶片溶出度异常原因[J]. 中国药科大学学报, 2024, 55(2): 224-229. [Liu WX, Li Y, Yuan YZ, et al. Analysis of the causes for abnormal dissolution of lansoprazole enteric-coated tablets by multiple techniques and different dimensions[J]. Journal of China Pharmaceutical University, 2024, 55(2): 224-229.] DOI: 10.11665/j.issn.1000-5048.2023052401.

6.刘宇澄, 冯雪松. 电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定兰索拉唑原料药中10种杂质元素[J].分析科学学报, 2024, 40(3): 369-372. [Liu YC, Feng XS. Determination of 10 elemental impurities in lansoprazole API by ICP-MS[J]. Journal of Analytical Science, 2024, 40(3): 369-372.] DOI: 10.13526/j.issn.1006-6144.2024.03.017.

7.杨良, 张毅, 朱高峰, 等. 兰索拉唑潜在杂质的合成[J]. 化学试剂, 2020, 42(9): 1120-1124. [Yang L, Zhang Y, Zhu GF, et al. Synthesis of potential impurities of lansoprazole[J]. Chemical Reagents, 2020, 42(9): 1120-1124.] DOI: 10.13822/j.cnki.hxsj.2020007576.

8.United States Pharmacopeia and National Formulary (USP-NF)[S]. 2025.

9.The European Pharmacopoeia 11.0[S]. 2022: 3204-3205.

10.The Japanese Pharmacopoeia 18th edition[S]. 2021: 1241-1242.

11.中国药典2025年版. 二部[S]. 2025: 283-286.

12.张余霞, 谭定渊, 史朝晖. HPLC法对注射用右兰索拉唑中有关物质的测定[J]. 中国合理用药探索, 2021, 18(8): 106-111. [Zhang YX, Tan DY, Shi ZH. Determination of related substances in dexlansoprazole for injection by HPLC[J]. China Licensed Pharmacist, 2021, 18(8): 106-111.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3327.2021.8.022.

13.王伟姣, 李彩花, 唐敬亮, 等. 高效液相色谱法测定右兰索拉唑含量及其异构体[J]. 中南药学, 2024, 22(9): 2424-2428. [Wang WJ, Li CH, Tang JL, et al. Determination of dexlansoprazole and its isomer by high performance liquid chromatography[J]. Central South Pharmacy, 2024, 22(9): 2424-2428.] DOI: 10.7539/j.issn.1672-2981.2024.09.028.

14.吴莉, 仲艳. HPLC-MS/MS法分析兰索拉唑中潜在基因毒性杂质[J]. 中国药师, 2022, 25(2): 378-381. [Wu L, Zhong  Y. Analysis of potential genotoxic impurities in lansoprazole by HPLC-MS/MS[J]. China Pharmacist, 2022, 25(2): 378-381.] DOI: 10.19962/j.cnki.issn1008-049X.2022.02.035.

15.张倩, 申芸, 赵恂, 等. 兰索拉唑相关杂质的遗传毒性研究 [J]. 中国药学杂志, 2023, 58(23): 2165-2171. [Zhang Q, Shen  Y, Zhao X, et al. Study on the genotoxicity of lansoprazole related impurities[J]. Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal, 2023, 58(23): 2165-2171.] DOI: 10.11669/cpj.2023.23.009.

16.中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局、中国国家标准化管理委员会. 医用输液、输血、注射器具检验方法第2部分: 生物学试验方法. GB/T 14233.2-2005[S]. 2005.

17.黄雅理, 孙会敏, 林飞, 等. 采用细胞毒性试验对23个药用包装材料进行生物安全性评价[J]. 癌变·畸变·突变, 2022, 34(2): 139-143. [Huang YL, Sun HM, Lin F, et al. Biocompatibility evaluation of 23 pharmaceutical packaging materials using cytotoxicity tests[J]. Carcinogenesis, Teratogenesis & Mutagenesis, 2022, 34(2): 139-143.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-616x.2022.02.012.

18.张钰莹, 单颖. 激活素A对L929成纤维细胞迁移、侵袭及细胞因子分泌的影响[J] 免疫学杂志, 2022, 38(1): 22-29. [Zhang YY, Shan Y. Effects of activin a on migration, invasion and cytokine secretion of L929 fibroblasts[J]. Immunological Journal, 2022, 38(1): 22-29.] DOI: 10.13431/j.cnki.immunol.j.20220004.

19.杜益, 张营, 汪玉馨, 等. 右兰索拉唑N-氧化物杂质测定及毒性分析[J]. 中国药品标准, 2018, 19(1): 32-37. [Du Y, Zhang Y, Wang YX, et al. Determination and toxicity analysis of dexlansoprazole N-oxide impurity[J]. Drug Standards of China, 2018, 19(1): 32-37.] DOI: 10.19778/j.chp.2018.01.007.

Popular papers
Last 6 months