Welcome to visit Zhongnan Medical Journal Press Series journal website!

Home Articles Vol 27,2024 No.1 Detail

Application of HPLC multi-components quantification combined with chemometrics and entropy weight-TOPSIS method in comprehensive quality evaluation of Solanum nigrum

Published on Feb. 08, 2024Total Views: 873 times Total Downloads: 425 times Download Mobile

Author: LI Sha 1 LU Guanting 1 CHEN Jun 1 ZHAO Gaoqi 1 LI Zhiguo 2

Affiliation: 1. Department of Pharmacy, Jinhua Central Hospital, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang Province, China 2. School of Pharmacy, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 311402, China

Keywords: Solanum nigrum High performance liquid chromatography Chemical pattern recognition Principal component analysis Orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis Entropy weight-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution Quality evaluation

DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.2023202311227

Reference: LI Sha, LU Guanting, CHEN Jun, ZHAO Gaoqi, LI Zhiguo.Application of HPLC multi-components quantification combined with chemometrics and entropy weight-TOPSIS method in comprehensive quality evaluation of Solanum nigrum[J].Zhongguo Yaoshi Zazhi,2024, 27(1):36-45.DOI: 10.12173/j.issn.1008-049X.202311227.[Article in Chinese]

  • Abstract
  • Full-text
  • References
Abstract

Objective  To establish a method for simultaneous determination of 11 components of Solanum nigrum from different producing areas, and to evaluate the quality by chemometrics and entropy weight-technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (EW-TOPSIS).

Methods  The 17 batches of Solanum nigrum samples from 8 provinces were collected. The high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was used to simultaneously determine the contents of medioresino, pinoresinol, quercetin, rutoside, solasonine, solamargine, khasianine, solasodine, desgalactotigonin, diosgenin and β-sitosterol, and the multi-components quantitative control mode of Solanum nigrum was established. The quality evaluation model of Solanum nigrum was established by using chemical recognition pattern and EW-TOPSIS method, and the overall quality was evaluated comprehensively.

Results  When the 11 components were in the 0.78-39.00, 0.55-27.50, 0.34-17.00, 0.21-10.50, 41.87-2 093.50, 60.95-3 047.50, 2.58-129.00, 1.02-51.00, 0.46-23.00, 1.05-52.50 and 0.42-21.00 µg/mL (r>0.999 0), their linear relationships were good. The average recovery was 96.81%-100.28% with the RSD<2.0% (n=9). 17 batches of samples clustered into 3 categories. Solamargine, solasonine, desgalactotigonin and medioresino may be the main potential markers affecting the quality of Solanum nigrum. The results of EW-TOPSIS method showed that, the quality evaluation closeness of 17 batches of Solanum nigrum were 0.433 6, 0.416 8, 0.624 2, 0.500 8, 0.479 1, 0.636 1, 0.568 3, 0.250 0, 0.190 9, 0.222 1, 0.170 7, 0.720 0, 0.698 3, 0.744 7, 0.717 9, 0.720 9 and 0.718 3, respectively, indicating that the overall quality of Solanum nigrum from Liaoning, Jilin and Heilongjiang were better, followed by Jiangsu, Henan and Anhui.

Conclusion  The established HPLC method for simultaneous determination of 11 components in Solanum nigrum is convenient and accurate. Chemometrics and EW-TOPSIS method are objective and comprehensive, which can be used for the overall quality evaluation of Solanum nigrum.

Full-text
Please download the PDF version to read the full text: download
References

1.王珏, 金一宝, 王铁杰, 等. 不同产地龙葵药材的高效液相色谱-蒸发光散射检测指纹图谱[J]. 色谱, 2015, 33(8): 809-815. [Wang J, Jin YB, Wang TJ, et al. Fingerprint of Solanum nigrun L. from diffetent habitats using high performance liquid chromatography with evaporative light-scattering detection[J]. Chinese Journal of Chromatography, 2015, 33(8): 809-815.] DOI: 10.3724/ sp.J.1123.2015.04022.

2.卫生部药品标准WS3-BW-0021-98[S]. 1998.

3.杨宇珂.龙葵果甾体生物碱类化学成分研究[D].北京: 中国中医科学院, 2022.

4.刘辰旺, 李鑫, 但林蔚, 等. 龙葵化学成分,药理作用及临床应用研究进展[J]. 现代中医药, 2023, 43(4): 105-117. [Liu CW, Li X, Dan LW, et al. Research progress on chemical constituents, pharmacological effects and clinical application of Solanum nigrum L. [J]. Modern Chinese Medicine, 2023, 43(4): 105-117.] DOI: 10.13424/ j.cnki.Mtcm.2023.04.021.

5.卢梦. 以活性为导向的龙葵化学成分分离, 鉴定及抗结直肠癌作用及机制研究[D]. 长春: 长春中医药大学, 2020.

6.毛午佳, 梁祝, 周赢, 等. 龙葵主要成分的药理作用及临床应用[J]. 云南化工, 2020, 47(10): 150-152. [Mao WJ, Liang Z, Zhou Y, et al. Pharmacological action and clinical application of main components of Longkui [J].Yunnan Chemical Technology, 2020, 47(10): 150-152.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-275X.2020.10.52.

7.赫军, 周畅玓, 马秉智, 等. 龙葵的化学成分及抗肿瘤药理活性研究进展[J]. 中国药房, 2015, 26(31): 4433-4436. [He J, Zhou CP, Ma BZ, et al. Research progress on chemical constituents and anti-tumor pharmacological activities of Solanum nigrum L. [J]. China Pharmacy, 2015, 26(31): 4433-4436.] DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408. 2015.31.37.

8.谢思源, 施浩, 白桂峰, 等. 龙葵活性物质的抗肿瘤作用研究进展[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2023, 40(6): 592-596. [Xie SY, Shi H, Bai GF, et al. Research progress on the anti-tumor effect of active substances from Solanum nigrum L. [J]. Journal of Xinxiang Medical University, 2023, 40(6): 592-596] DOI: 10.7683/xxyxyxb.2023.06017.

9.安徽省药品监督管理局. 安徽省中药材标准[S]. 2022.

10.辽宁省药品监督管理局. 辽宁省中药材标准[S]. 2019.

11.陕西省药品监督管理局. 陕西省中药材标准[S]. 2015.

12.胡淑曼, 王聪, 刘红兵, 等. 龙葵药材质量标准的研究 [J]. 时珍国医国药, 2016, 27(10): 2375-2378. [Hu SM, Wang C, Liu HB, et al. Research on quality standards of Solanum nigrum L. [J]. Lishixhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research, 2016, 27(10): 2375-2378.] DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1008-0805.2016.10.023.

13.张彦华, 钱大玮, 唐于平, 等. 龙葵药材的质量评价研究[J]. 南京中医药大学学报, 2012, 28(4): 374-377. [Zhang YH, Qian DW, Tang YP, et al. Quality evaluation on herba Solani nigri[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of TCM, 2012, 28(4): 374-377.] DOI: 10.14148/j.issn.1672-0482.2012.04.022.

14.赵雯雯, 张锦超, 孙秀蕊, 等. 基于多指标结合化学计量学的龙葵果质量评价研究[J]. 中草药, 2022, 53(9): 2803-2809. [Zhao WW, Zhang JC, Sun XR, et al. Quality evaluation of fruits of Solanum nigrum based on multiple index and chemometrics[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2022, 53(9): 2803-2809.] DOI: 10.7501/j. issn. 0253-2670. 2022. 09. 024.

15.王强, 徐建, 王宏伟. 反相高效液相色谱法测定龙葵果中澳洲茄碱和澳洲茄边碱的含量[J]. 长春师范大学学报, 2020, 39(12): 100-102. [Wang Q, Xu J, Wang HW, et al. Simultaneous determination of two steroidal alkaloids from the fruit of Solanum nigrum by RP-HPLC[J]. Journal of Changchun Normal University, 2020, 39(12): 100-102.] https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=122x0t50pa7v0mw0275a0j50ht480118&site=xueshu_se.

16.王珏, 金一宝, 王铁杰, 等. 不同采收期龙葵药材质量研究[J]. 中国现代中药, 2018, 20(1): 66-69, 73. [Wang J, Jin YB, Wang TL, et al. Studies on quality of Solanum nigrum in different harvested periods[J]. Modern Chinese Medicine, 2018, 20(1): 66-69,73.] DOI: 10. 13313/j.issn.1673-4890. 20170907001.

17.于洋, 李军, 李宝国. 化学计量学在中药质量控制研究中的应用[J]. 中成药, 2018, 40(5): 1139-1142. [Yu Y, Li J, Li BG, et al. Application of chemometrics in quality control of traditional Chinese medicine[J]. Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine, 2018, 40(5): 1139-1142.] DOI: 10. 3969/j. issn. 1001-1528. 2018. 05. 028.

18.肖会敏, 杨旭, 黄新文, 等. 基于HPLC指纹图谱及多成分含量的化学模式识别法评价小血藤质量[J]. 西北药学, 2022, 37(5): 1-7. [Xiao HY, Yang X, Huang XW, et al. Quality evaluation of Schisandra propinqua var. Sinensis based on HPLC finger-print and multi-component content determination[J]. Northwest Pharmaceutical Journal, 2022, 37(5): 1-7.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2407.2022.05.001.

19.冯晓川, 徐延昭, 张静, 等. 芪蓉润肠口服液HPLC-QAMS多指标成分定量控制联合化学计量学的综合质量评价研究[J]. 药物流行病学杂志, 2023, 32(4): 404-416. [Feng XC, Xu YZ, Zhang J, et al. Comprehensive quality evaluation of Qirong Runchang oral liquid based on HPLC-QAMS quantitative control of multi-components and chemometrics analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Pharmacoepidemiology, 2023, 32(4): 404-416.] DOI: 10.19960/j .issn. 1005-0698. 202304006.

20.王玉霞, 武晓玉, 夏鹏飞, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型对经不同方法干燥的苦水玫瑰品质的综合评价[J]. 中成药, 2021, 43(5): 1241-1248. [Wang YX, Wu XY, Xia PF, et al. Entropy-based TOPSIS model for comprehensive evaluation of quality of differently dried Rosa sertata ×Rosa rugosa[J]. Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine, 2021, 43(5): 1241-1248.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1528. 2021. 02. 025.

21.肖珊, 罗姣, 许忠, 等. HPLC法同时检测16种五加属植物中14种苯丙素类成分[J]. 中草药, 2020, 51(14): 3791-3796. [Xiao S, Luo J, Xu Z, et al. Simultaneous determination of 14 phenylpropanoids in 16 species of Acanthopanax plants by HPLC [J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2020, 51(14): 3791-3796.] DOI: 10.7501/j.issn.0253-2670. 2020. 14. 025.

22.李静, 贾文江, 曹望弟, 等. 高效液相色谱法同时测定分心木中芦丁、槲皮素、金丝桃苷含量[J]. 中国药业, 2021, 30(20): 61-63. [Li J, Jia WJ, Cao WD, et al. Content determination of rutin, quercetin and hypericin in Diaphragma juglandis fructus by HPLC [J].China Pharmaceuticals, 2021, 30(20): 61-63.] DOI: 10. 3969/j.issn.1006-4931. 2021.20.016.

23.盘涌, 罗彩神, 覃日宏, 等. HPLC法测定糯米藤中槲皮素和山柰酚的含量[J]. 广州化工, 2022, 50(6): 83-85. [Pan Y, Luo CS, Qin RH, et al. Determination of quercetin and kaempferol in Gonostegiahirta by HPLC[J]. Guangzhou Chemical Industry, 2022, 50(6): 83-85.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9677.2022.06.027.

24.张为, 田娜娜, 屈文燕, 等. 龙葵TLC鉴别与HPLC指纹图谱建立[J]. 中成药, 2017, 39(11): 2421-2424. [Zhang W, Tian NN, Qu WY, et al. Establishment of TLC identification and HPLC fingerprint of Solanum nigrum L. [J]. Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine, 2017, 39(11):2421-2424.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1528. 2017.11.047.

25.王志杰, 张伟, 彭霞, 等. HPLC法测定箭根薯中薯蓣皂苷元的含量[J]. 中国民族民间医药, 2019, 28(5): 27-30. [Wang ZJ, Zhang W, Peng X, et al. HPLC determination of diosgenin in Tacca chantrieri [J]. Chinese Journal of Ethnomedicine and Ethnopharmacy, 2019, 28(5): 27-30.] DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-8517.2019.5.zgmzmjyyzz201905007.

26.尹君, 胡鹏辉,舒畅. 高效液相色谱法同时检测油脂类药用辅料中胆甾醇、豆甾醇和β-谷甾醇的含量[J]. 中南药学, 2022, 20(3): 609-612. [Yin J, Hu PH, Shu C, et al. Simultaneous determination of cholesterol,stigmasterol and β-sitosterol in oil pharmaceutical excipients by HPLC  [J]. Central South Pharmacy, 2022, 20(3): 609-612.] DOI: 10.7539/j.issn.1672-2981.2022.03.024.

Popular papers
Last 6 months